Heterogeneity in crowding-out: When are charitable donations responsive to government support?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

When are donations to non-profit organizations responsive to changes in government funding? This article examines relations between government financial support and charitable donations in an innovative mixed-methods design. A unique data set is obtained, matching individual-level survey data from the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey with media coverage of government support from LexisNexis and organizational-level information from the Dutch Central Bureau on Fundraising from 2002 to 2014. An interpretative analysis shows the ways in which people are informed about changes in public funding, which is assumed to be a prerequisite for donors to change their donations. Media coverage often does not reflect actual changes in government support. Additionally, regression analyses are deployed to examine how changes in government support and media reports are associated with changes in donations. The results show that responses to public funding are dependent on the non-profit context. Donations in the fields of social services, health, and nature are displaced by government support, while crowding-out does not occur in the field of international development. Even in fields where crowding-out is more likely to occur, the increase in donations does not offset the decrease in public support. The conclusions nuance popular beliefs about the direct consequences that policy changes have for public awareness and participation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-71
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Sociological Review
Volume33
Issue number1
Early online date1 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

crowding out
donation
funding
coverage
fundraising
non-profit-organization
public support
mobile social services
Netherlands
regression
participation
health

Cite this

@article{b7de4ad61da94c4cae2b6eaddb370491,
title = "Heterogeneity in crowding-out: When are charitable donations responsive to government support?",
abstract = "When are donations to non-profit organizations responsive to changes in government funding? This article examines relations between government financial support and charitable donations in an innovative mixed-methods design. A unique data set is obtained, matching individual-level survey data from the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey with media coverage of government support from LexisNexis and organizational-level information from the Dutch Central Bureau on Fundraising from 2002 to 2014. An interpretative analysis shows the ways in which people are informed about changes in public funding, which is assumed to be a prerequisite for donors to change their donations. Media coverage often does not reflect actual changes in government support. Additionally, regression analyses are deployed to examine how changes in government support and media reports are associated with changes in donations. The results show that responses to public funding are dependent on the non-profit context. Donations in the fields of social services, health, and nature are displaced by government support, while crowding-out does not occur in the field of international development. Even in fields where crowding-out is more likely to occur, the increase in donations does not offset the decrease in public support. The conclusions nuance popular beliefs about the direct consequences that policy changes have for public awareness and participation.",
author = "{de Wit}, A. and R.H.F.P. Bekkers and {Broese Van Groenou}, M.I.",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1093/esr/jcw048",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "59--71",
journal = "European Sociological Review",
issn = "0266-7215",
publisher = "Unesco & Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Heterogeneity in crowding-out: When are charitable donations responsive to government support? / de Wit, A.; Bekkers, R.H.F.P.; Broese Van Groenou, M.I.

In: European Sociological Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 02.2017, p. 59-71.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heterogeneity in crowding-out: When are charitable donations responsive to government support?

AU - de Wit, A.

AU - Bekkers, R.H.F.P.

AU - Broese Van Groenou, M.I.

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - When are donations to non-profit organizations responsive to changes in government funding? This article examines relations between government financial support and charitable donations in an innovative mixed-methods design. A unique data set is obtained, matching individual-level survey data from the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey with media coverage of government support from LexisNexis and organizational-level information from the Dutch Central Bureau on Fundraising from 2002 to 2014. An interpretative analysis shows the ways in which people are informed about changes in public funding, which is assumed to be a prerequisite for donors to change their donations. Media coverage often does not reflect actual changes in government support. Additionally, regression analyses are deployed to examine how changes in government support and media reports are associated with changes in donations. The results show that responses to public funding are dependent on the non-profit context. Donations in the fields of social services, health, and nature are displaced by government support, while crowding-out does not occur in the field of international development. Even in fields where crowding-out is more likely to occur, the increase in donations does not offset the decrease in public support. The conclusions nuance popular beliefs about the direct consequences that policy changes have for public awareness and participation.

AB - When are donations to non-profit organizations responsive to changes in government funding? This article examines relations between government financial support and charitable donations in an innovative mixed-methods design. A unique data set is obtained, matching individual-level survey data from the Giving in the Netherlands Panel Survey with media coverage of government support from LexisNexis and organizational-level information from the Dutch Central Bureau on Fundraising from 2002 to 2014. An interpretative analysis shows the ways in which people are informed about changes in public funding, which is assumed to be a prerequisite for donors to change their donations. Media coverage often does not reflect actual changes in government support. Additionally, regression analyses are deployed to examine how changes in government support and media reports are associated with changes in donations. The results show that responses to public funding are dependent on the non-profit context. Donations in the fields of social services, health, and nature are displaced by government support, while crowding-out does not occur in the field of international development. Even in fields where crowding-out is more likely to occur, the increase in donations does not offset the decrease in public support. The conclusions nuance popular beliefs about the direct consequences that policy changes have for public awareness and participation.

U2 - 10.1093/esr/jcw048

DO - 10.1093/esr/jcw048

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 59

EP - 71

JO - European Sociological Review

JF - European Sociological Review

SN - 0266-7215

IS - 1

ER -