High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization

Kelly Kirkland*, Paul A.M. Van Lange, Drew Gorenz, Khandis Blake, Catherine E. Amiot, Liisi Ausmees, Peter Baguma, Oumar Barry, Maja Becker, Michal Bilewicz, Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat, Robert W. Booth, Thomas Castelain, Giulio Costantini, Girts Dimdins, Agustín Espinosa, Gillian Finchilescu, Ronald Fischer, Malte Friese, Ángel GómezRoberto González, Nobuhiko Goto, Peter Halama, Camilo Hurtado-Parrado, Ruby D. Ilustrisimo, Gabriela M. Jiga-Boy, Peter Kuppens, Steve Loughnan, Khairul A. Mastor, Neil McLatchie, Lindsay M. Novak, Blessing N. Onyekachi, Muhammad Rizwan, Mark Schaller, Eleonora Serafimovska, Eunkook M. Suh, William B. Swann, Eddie M.W. Tong, Ana Torres, Rhiannon N. Turner, Christin Melanie Vauclair, Alexander Vinogradov, Zhechen Wang, Victoria Wai Lan Yeung, Brock Bastian

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Throughout the 21st century, economic inequality is predicted to increase as we face new challenges, from changes in the technological landscape to the growing climate crisis. It is crucial we understand how these changes in inequality may affect how people think and behave. We propose that economic inequality threatens the social fabric of society, in turn increasing moralization—that is, the greater tendency to employ or emphasize morality in everyday life—as an attempt to restore order and control. Using longitudinal data from X, formerly known as Twitter, our first study demonstrates that high economic inequality is associated with greater use of moral language online (e.g. the use of words such as “disgust”, “hurt”, and “respect’). Study 2 then examined data from 41 regions around the world, generally showing that higher inequality has a small association with harsher moral judgments of people’s everyday actions. Together these findings demonstrate that economic inequality is linked to the tendency to see the world through a moral lens.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpgae221
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalPNAS Nexus
Volume3
Issue number7
Early online date5 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Funding

B.B. was supported by the Australian Research Council (ARC) (grant number DP200101446), S.L. was supported by the Philip Leverhulme Prize, C.A. was supported by a Senior Fellowship from the Fund for Research on Health\u2014Qu\u00E9bec (FRQS: no. 268393), R.G. was supported by the Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (ANID/FONDAP 15130009), the Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (ANID/FONDAP 15110006) and the Fondecyt Program (ANID/Fondecyt 1201788), \u00C1.G. was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2021-124617OB-I00) and by the ERC Grant agreement no: 101018172, Z.W. was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation fellowship (2021M690681) and the National Social Science Fund of China (22CSH093), N.G. was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (grant number 19KK0063), G.D. was supported by the Latvian Council of Science (grant number lzp-2018/1-0402), and M.B. was supported by the Polish National Science Centre Grant Opus (grant number UMO-2023/49/B/HS6/0142).

FundersFunder number
ANID
Fondecyt Program
Ministerio de Ciencia e InnovaciónPID2021-124617OB-I00
Fund for Research on Health268393
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences22CSH093
Fondecyt1201788
Polish National Science CentreUMO-2023/49/B/HS6/0142
ERC101018172
Latvian Council of Sciencelzp-2018/1-0402
JSPS19KK0063
Center for Intercultural and Indigenous ResearchANID/FONDAP 15110006
Australian Research CouncilDP200101446
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation2021M690681
Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion StudiesANID/FONDAP 15130009

    Keywords

    • anomie
    • economic inequality
    • moral judgments
    • moralization
    • Twitter

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'High economic inequality is linked to greater moralization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this