History of psychology turned inside out

J.F.H. van Rappard

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Danziger (1994) distinguished between the insider-scientist and the outsider-historian models for the history of psychology. The present paper contends that since in psychology history has a contemporary relevance, there is a place for insider history in the discipline; hence, a mixed model is appropriate. Issue is taken with Danziger's view of insider history as inherently celebratory. It is finally argued that it is doubtful if critical history bridges the gap between the two historiographical models. © 1997, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-105
Number of pages5
JournalTheory and Psychology
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'History of psychology turned inside out'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this