Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Honest by Chance: A Qualitative Interview Study to Clarify Respondents’ (Non-)Compliance With Computer-Assisted Randomized Response Honnête par chance, une étude qualitative par entretien de la (non) coopération dans une enquête assistée par ordinateur et à réponse randomisée

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The randomized response method (RRM) is intended to minimize evasive responses to sensitive social questions. This study examines how respondents participate in the RRM and how their participation contributes to (in)adequate answers. Eleven respondents, all social service clients, answered twelve questions in a computer-assisted survey. The forced response technique was used as the RRM, and computerised dice (internal randomiser) were alternated with manual dice (external randomiser). Respondents’ behaviour was video taped. Afterwards, a qualitative interview was conducted which was audio-taped. The results show that the RRM caused very few problems. All respondents had trouble giving false answers forced by dice and, as a consequence, some cheated. Moreover, their individual interest, capping of their social service allowance, determined their compliance since it overruled all other arguments even when the respondents understood the RRM. © 2002, SAGE Publications Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-39
JournalBMS Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/ Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique
Volume75
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Honest by Chance: A Qualitative Interview Study to Clarify Respondents’ (Non-)Compliance With Computer-Assisted Randomized Response Honnête par chance, une étude qualitative par entretien de la (non) coopération dans une enquête assistée par ordinateur et à réponse randomisée'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this