How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure

Berber S. Laarman, Renée J.R. Bouwman, Anke J.E. De Veer, Michelle Hendriks, Roland D. Friele

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear. Methods: All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated. Results: Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients' wishes (35%). Conclusion: The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere023576
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Professional Practice
Disclosure
Netherlands
Health
Defensive Medicine
Quality Improvement
Anxiety Disorders
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research

Keywords

  • health policy
  • medical law
  • quality in health care
  • risk management

Cite this

@article{c2b63c3973f145ffaca72b162f411c00,
title = "How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure",
abstract = "Introduction: Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear. Methods: All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43{\%} (n=210). 21.4{\%} received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated. Results: Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8{\%} of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6{\%}), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2{\%}) or indications of burnout (10.8{\%}). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41{\%}) and complying more with patients' wishes (35{\%}). Conclusion: The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.",
keywords = "health policy, medical law, quality in health care, risk management",
author = "Laarman, {Berber S.} and Bouwman, {Ren{\'e}e J.R.} and {De Veer}, {Anke J.E.} and Michelle Hendriks and Friele, {Roland D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure. / Laarman, Berber S.; Bouwman, Renée J.R.; De Veer, Anke J.E.; Hendriks, Michelle; Friele, Roland D.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 3, e023576, 15.03.2019, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure

AU - Laarman, Berber S.

AU - Bouwman, Renée J.R.

AU - De Veer, Anke J.E.

AU - Hendriks, Michelle

AU - Friele, Roland D.

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - Introduction: Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear. Methods: All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated. Results: Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients' wishes (35%). Conclusion: The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.

AB - Introduction: Disciplinary procedures can have serious consequences for the health, personal life and professional functioning of doctors. Until recently, specific disciplinary measures (reprimands) were publicly disclosed in the Netherlands. The perceived additional impact of disclosing reprimands on the professional and personal life of doctors is unclear. Methods: All doctors who received a disciplinary measure from the Dutch Disciplinary Board between July 2012 and August 2016 were invited to partake in a 60-item questionnaire concerning the respondents' characteristics, the complaint, experience with the procedure and perceived impact of the procedure on health and professional functioning as reported by doctors themselves. The response rate was 43% (n=210). 21.4% received a reprimand (disclosed); the remainder received a warning (not disclosed). Differences between the two groups were calculated. Results: Respondents with a reprimand reported significantly more negative experiences and impact on health and work than respondents with a warning. 37.8% of the doctors said their health was very good. A small percentage reported moderate-to-severe depressive complaints (3.6%), moderate-to-severe anxiety disorder (2%) or indications of burnout (10.8%). The majority reported changes in their professional practices associated with 'defensive medicine', such as doing more supplementary research (41%) and complying more with patients' wishes (35%). Conclusion: The Dutch disciplinary procedure has strong negative side effects, that disclosing measures seems to increase. Dutch disciplinary law aims to contribute to the quality of professional practice. A safe environment is a basic condition for quality improvement and therefore, disclosure of disciplinary measures should be carefully considered. Disclosure of disciplinary measures has always been controversial and the results of this study has rekindled this debate. Recently, a majority in the Dutch House of Representatives has voted against disclosure of reprimands, leaving disclosure of reprimands a discretion of the disciplinary board when deemed appropriate or necessary.

KW - health policy

KW - medical law

KW - quality in health care

KW - risk management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063110219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063110219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 3

M1 - e023576

ER -