How old is your fold?

Henry F. Winstanley, Sanne Abeln, Charlotte M. Deane

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Motivation: At present there exists no age estimate for the different protein structures found in nature. It has become clear from occurrence studies that different folds arose at different points in evolutionary time. An estimation of the age of different folds would be a starting point for many investigations into protein structure evolution: how we arrived at the set of folds we see today. It would also be a powerful tool in protein structure classification allowing us to reassess the available hierarchical methods and perhaps suggest improvements. Results: We have created the first relative age estimation technique for protein folds. Our method is based on constructing parsimonious scenarios, which can describe occurrence patterns in a phylogeny of species. The ages presented are shown to be robust to the different trees or data types used for their generation. They show correlations with other previously used protein age estimators, but appear to be far more discriminating than any previously suggested technique. The age estimates given are not absolutes but they already offer intriguing insights, like the very different age patterns of α/β folds compared with small folds. The α/β folds appear on average to be far older than their small fold counterparts.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBioinformatics
Volume21
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Fold
Proteins
Protein Structure
Phylogeny
Protein
Estimate
Estimator
Scenarios

Cite this

Winstanley, Henry F. ; Abeln, Sanne ; Deane, Charlotte M. / How old is your fold?. In: Bioinformatics. 2005 ; Vol. 21, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{2f891f8e163a4e3796e53d93732f2bd1,
title = "How old is your fold?",
abstract = "Motivation: At present there exists no age estimate for the different protein structures found in nature. It has become clear from occurrence studies that different folds arose at different points in evolutionary time. An estimation of the age of different folds would be a starting point for many investigations into protein structure evolution: how we arrived at the set of folds we see today. It would also be a powerful tool in protein structure classification allowing us to reassess the available hierarchical methods and perhaps suggest improvements. Results: We have created the first relative age estimation technique for protein folds. Our method is based on constructing parsimonious scenarios, which can describe occurrence patterns in a phylogeny of species. The ages presented are shown to be robust to the different trees or data types used for their generation. They show correlations with other previously used protein age estimators, but appear to be far more discriminating than any previously suggested technique. The age estimates given are not absolutes but they already offer intriguing insights, like the very different age patterns of α/β folds compared with small folds. The α/β folds appear on average to be far older than their small fold counterparts.",
author = "Winstanley, {Henry F.} and Sanne Abeln and Deane, {Charlotte M.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1008",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Bioinformatics",
issn = "1367-4803",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

Winstanley, HF, Abeln, S & Deane, CM 2005, 'How old is your fold?' Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. SUPPL. 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1008

How old is your fold? / Winstanley, Henry F.; Abeln, Sanne; Deane, Charlotte M.

In: Bioinformatics, Vol. 21, No. SUPPL. 1, 06.2005.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How old is your fold?

AU - Winstanley, Henry F.

AU - Abeln, Sanne

AU - Deane, Charlotte M.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Motivation: At present there exists no age estimate for the different protein structures found in nature. It has become clear from occurrence studies that different folds arose at different points in evolutionary time. An estimation of the age of different folds would be a starting point for many investigations into protein structure evolution: how we arrived at the set of folds we see today. It would also be a powerful tool in protein structure classification allowing us to reassess the available hierarchical methods and perhaps suggest improvements. Results: We have created the first relative age estimation technique for protein folds. Our method is based on constructing parsimonious scenarios, which can describe occurrence patterns in a phylogeny of species. The ages presented are shown to be robust to the different trees or data types used for their generation. They show correlations with other previously used protein age estimators, but appear to be far more discriminating than any previously suggested technique. The age estimates given are not absolutes but they already offer intriguing insights, like the very different age patterns of α/β folds compared with small folds. The α/β folds appear on average to be far older than their small fold counterparts.

AB - Motivation: At present there exists no age estimate for the different protein structures found in nature. It has become clear from occurrence studies that different folds arose at different points in evolutionary time. An estimation of the age of different folds would be a starting point for many investigations into protein structure evolution: how we arrived at the set of folds we see today. It would also be a powerful tool in protein structure classification allowing us to reassess the available hierarchical methods and perhaps suggest improvements. Results: We have created the first relative age estimation technique for protein folds. Our method is based on constructing parsimonious scenarios, which can describe occurrence patterns in a phylogeny of species. The ages presented are shown to be robust to the different trees or data types used for their generation. They show correlations with other previously used protein age estimators, but appear to be far more discriminating than any previously suggested technique. The age estimates given are not absolutes but they already offer intriguing insights, like the very different age patterns of α/β folds compared with small folds. The α/β folds appear on average to be far older than their small fold counterparts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144471907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144471907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1008

DO - 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1008

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Bioinformatics

JF - Bioinformatics

SN - 1367-4803

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -