How physical therapists instruct patients with stroke: an observational study on attentional focus during gait rehabilitation after stroke

E. Kal, H. Brink, H. Houdijk, J. van der Kamp, P.H. Goossens, C. van Bennekom, E. Scherder

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupPurpose: People without neurological impairments show superior motor learning when they focus on movement effects (external focus) rather than on movement execution itself (internal focus). Despite its potential for neurorehabilitation, it remains unclear to what extent external focus strategies are currently incorporated in rehabilitation post-stroke. Therefore, we observed how physical therapists use attentional focus when treating gait of rehabilitating patients with stroke. Methods: Twenty physical therapist-patient couples from six rehabilitation centers participated. Per couple, one regular gait-training session was video-recorded. Therapists’ statements were classified using a standardized scoring method to determine the relative proportion of internally and externally focused instructions/feedback. Also, we explored associations between therapists’ use of external/internal focus strategies and patients’ focus preference, length of stay, mobility, and cognition. Results: Therapists’ instructions were generally more external while feedback was more internal. Therapists used relatively more externally focused statements for patients with a longer length of stay (B = −0.239, p = 0.013) and for patients who had a stronger internal focus preference (B = −0.930, p = 0.035). Conclusions: Physical therapists used more external focus instructions, but more internally focused feedback. Also, they seem to adapt their attentional focus use to patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase. Future research may determine how these factors influence the effectiveness of different attentional foci for motor learning post-stroke. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPhysical therapists use a balanced mix of internal focus and external focus instructions and feedback when treating gait of stroke patients.Therapists predominantly used an external focus for patients in later rehabilitation phases, and for patients with stronger internal focus preferences, possibly in an attempt to stimulate more automatic control of movement in these patients.Future research should further explore how a patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase influence the effectiveness of different focus strategies.Awaiting further research, we recommend that therapists use both attentional focus strategies, and explore per patient which focus works best on a trial-and-error basis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1154-1165
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Volume40
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Physical Therapists
Gait
Observational Studies
Stroke
Patient Preference
Rehabilitation
Length of Stay
Learning
Stroke Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Centers
Cognition
Research Design

Keywords

  • Motor learning
  • external focus of attention
  • physical therapy
  • rehabilitation
  • stroke

Cite this

@article{544dfe4fd3a6421196affd92a3f7086a,
title = "How physical therapists instruct patients with stroke:: an observational study on attentional focus during gait rehabilitation after stroke",
abstract = "{\circledC} 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupPurpose: People without neurological impairments show superior motor learning when they focus on movement effects (external focus) rather than on movement execution itself (internal focus). Despite its potential for neurorehabilitation, it remains unclear to what extent external focus strategies are currently incorporated in rehabilitation post-stroke. Therefore, we observed how physical therapists use attentional focus when treating gait of rehabilitating patients with stroke. Methods: Twenty physical therapist-patient couples from six rehabilitation centers participated. Per couple, one regular gait-training session was video-recorded. Therapists’ statements were classified using a standardized scoring method to determine the relative proportion of internally and externally focused instructions/feedback. Also, we explored associations between therapists’ use of external/internal focus strategies and patients’ focus preference, length of stay, mobility, and cognition. Results: Therapists’ instructions were generally more external while feedback was more internal. Therapists used relatively more externally focused statements for patients with a longer length of stay (B = −0.239, p = 0.013) and for patients who had a stronger internal focus preference (B = −0.930, p = 0.035). Conclusions: Physical therapists used more external focus instructions, but more internally focused feedback. Also, they seem to adapt their attentional focus use to patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase. Future research may determine how these factors influence the effectiveness of different attentional foci for motor learning post-stroke. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPhysical therapists use a balanced mix of internal focus and external focus instructions and feedback when treating gait of stroke patients.Therapists predominantly used an external focus for patients in later rehabilitation phases, and for patients with stronger internal focus preferences, possibly in an attempt to stimulate more automatic control of movement in these patients.Future research should further explore how a patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase influence the effectiveness of different focus strategies.Awaiting further research, we recommend that therapists use both attentional focus strategies, and explore per patient which focus works best on a trial-and-error basis.",
keywords = "Motor learning, external focus of attention, physical therapy, rehabilitation, stroke",
author = "E. Kal and H. Brink and H. Houdijk and {van der Kamp}, J. and P.H. Goossens and {van Bennekom}, C. and E. Scherder",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/09638288.2017.1290697",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1154--1165",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "10",

}

How physical therapists instruct patients with stroke: an observational study on attentional focus during gait rehabilitation after stroke. / Kal, E.; Brink, H.; Houdijk, H.; van der Kamp, J.; Goossens, P.H.; van Bennekom, C.; Scherder, E.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 40, No. 10, 24.02.2017, p. 1154-1165.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How physical therapists instruct patients with stroke:

T2 - an observational study on attentional focus during gait rehabilitation after stroke

AU - Kal, E.

AU - Brink, H.

AU - Houdijk, H.

AU - van der Kamp, J.

AU - Goossens, P.H.

AU - van Bennekom, C.

AU - Scherder, E.

PY - 2017/2/24

Y1 - 2017/2/24

N2 - © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupPurpose: People without neurological impairments show superior motor learning when they focus on movement effects (external focus) rather than on movement execution itself (internal focus). Despite its potential for neurorehabilitation, it remains unclear to what extent external focus strategies are currently incorporated in rehabilitation post-stroke. Therefore, we observed how physical therapists use attentional focus when treating gait of rehabilitating patients with stroke. Methods: Twenty physical therapist-patient couples from six rehabilitation centers participated. Per couple, one regular gait-training session was video-recorded. Therapists’ statements were classified using a standardized scoring method to determine the relative proportion of internally and externally focused instructions/feedback. Also, we explored associations between therapists’ use of external/internal focus strategies and patients’ focus preference, length of stay, mobility, and cognition. Results: Therapists’ instructions were generally more external while feedback was more internal. Therapists used relatively more externally focused statements for patients with a longer length of stay (B = −0.239, p = 0.013) and for patients who had a stronger internal focus preference (B = −0.930, p = 0.035). Conclusions: Physical therapists used more external focus instructions, but more internally focused feedback. Also, they seem to adapt their attentional focus use to patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase. Future research may determine how these factors influence the effectiveness of different attentional foci for motor learning post-stroke. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPhysical therapists use a balanced mix of internal focus and external focus instructions and feedback when treating gait of stroke patients.Therapists predominantly used an external focus for patients in later rehabilitation phases, and for patients with stronger internal focus preferences, possibly in an attempt to stimulate more automatic control of movement in these patients.Future research should further explore how a patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase influence the effectiveness of different focus strategies.Awaiting further research, we recommend that therapists use both attentional focus strategies, and explore per patient which focus works best on a trial-and-error basis.

AB - © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis GroupPurpose: People without neurological impairments show superior motor learning when they focus on movement effects (external focus) rather than on movement execution itself (internal focus). Despite its potential for neurorehabilitation, it remains unclear to what extent external focus strategies are currently incorporated in rehabilitation post-stroke. Therefore, we observed how physical therapists use attentional focus when treating gait of rehabilitating patients with stroke. Methods: Twenty physical therapist-patient couples from six rehabilitation centers participated. Per couple, one regular gait-training session was video-recorded. Therapists’ statements were classified using a standardized scoring method to determine the relative proportion of internally and externally focused instructions/feedback. Also, we explored associations between therapists’ use of external/internal focus strategies and patients’ focus preference, length of stay, mobility, and cognition. Results: Therapists’ instructions were generally more external while feedback was more internal. Therapists used relatively more externally focused statements for patients with a longer length of stay (B = −0.239, p = 0.013) and for patients who had a stronger internal focus preference (B = −0.930, p = 0.035). Conclusions: Physical therapists used more external focus instructions, but more internally focused feedback. Also, they seem to adapt their attentional focus use to patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase. Future research may determine how these factors influence the effectiveness of different attentional foci for motor learning post-stroke. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPhysical therapists use a balanced mix of internal focus and external focus instructions and feedback when treating gait of stroke patients.Therapists predominantly used an external focus for patients in later rehabilitation phases, and for patients with stronger internal focus preferences, possibly in an attempt to stimulate more automatic control of movement in these patients.Future research should further explore how a patients’ focus preference and rehabilitation phase influence the effectiveness of different focus strategies.Awaiting further research, we recommend that therapists use both attentional focus strategies, and explore per patient which focus works best on a trial-and-error basis.

KW - Motor learning

KW - external focus of attention

KW - physical therapy

KW - rehabilitation

KW - stroke

U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2017.1290697

DO - 10.1080/09638288.2017.1290697

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1154

EP - 1165

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 10

ER -