How to measure comorbidity. A critical review of available methods

V. de Groot, H. Beckerman, G.J. Lankhorst, L.M. Bouter

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    962 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The object of this article was to systematically review available methods to measure comorbidity and to assess their validity and reliability. A search was made in Medline and Embase, with the keywords comorbidity and multi-morbidity, to identify articles in which a method to measure comorbidity was described. The references of these articles were also checked, and using a standardized checklist the relevant data were extracted from these articles. An assessment was made of the content, concurrent, predictive and construct validity, and the reliability. Thirteen different methods to measure comorbidity were identified: one disease count and 12 indexes. Data on content and predictive validity were available for all measures, while data on construct validity were available for nine methods, data on concurrent validity, and interrater reliability for eight methods, and data on intrarater reliability for three methods. The Charlson Index is the most extensively studied comorbidity index for predicting mortality. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) addresses all relevant body systems without using specific diagnoses. The Index of Coexisting Disease (ICED) has a two-dimensional structure, measuring disease severity and disability, which can be useful when mortality and disability are the outcomes of interest. The Kaplan Index was specifically developed for use in diabetes research. The Charlson Index, the CIRS, the ICED and the Kaplan Index are valid and reliable methods to measure comorbidity that can be used in clinical research. For the other indexes, insufficient data on the clinimetric properties are available. © 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)221-229
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
    Volume56
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • *Comorbidity
    • *Epidemiologic Methods
    • Health Status Indicators
    • Humans
    • Prognosis
    • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
    • Reproducibility of Results
    • Severity of Illness Index

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How to measure comorbidity. A critical review of available methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this