Human involvement in e-coaching: Effects on effectiveness, perceived influence and trust

Bart A. Kamphorst, Michel C A Klein, Arlette van Wissen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Coaching practices are rapidly changing due to advances in pervasive computing: behavior of coachees can unobtrusively be monitored in real time, and coaching can be remote or even fully automated. Fully autonomous e-coaching systems hold promise for improving people’s self-management, but also raise questions about the importance of human involvement in the e-coaching process. This paper describes an empirical ‘Wizard of Oz’ study in which coachees (N=82) were coached to take the stairs by either another person (N=20) or the e-coaching system eMate. Crucially, some coachees were made to believe that they would receive one type of coaching (human or computerized), while in reality they received the other. Results show that the coaching was equally effective in all groups, but that people who believed to be coached by a human judged the coaching to be more influential. No difference was found between groups in how trustworthy coachees found their coaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-29
Number of pages14
JournalLecture Notes in Computer Science
Volume8749
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Stairs
Ubiquitous computing
Self-management
Pervasive Computing
Person
Human
Influence

Cite this

@article{93aaefef3ee948bb802ff160f63b77a1,
title = "Human involvement in e-coaching: Effects on effectiveness, perceived influence and trust",
abstract = "Coaching practices are rapidly changing due to advances in pervasive computing: behavior of coachees can unobtrusively be monitored in real time, and coaching can be remote or even fully automated. Fully autonomous e-coaching systems hold promise for improving people’s self-management, but also raise questions about the importance of human involvement in the e-coaching process. This paper describes an empirical ‘Wizard of Oz’ study in which coachees (N=82) were coached to take the stairs by either another person (N=20) or the e-coaching system eMate. Crucially, some coachees were made to believe that they would receive one type of coaching (human or computerized), while in reality they received the other. Results show that the coaching was equally effective in all groups, but that people who believed to be coached by a human judged the coaching to be more influential. No difference was found between groups in how trustworthy coachees found their coaches.",
author = "Kamphorst, {Bart A.} and Klein, {Michel C A} and {van Wissen}, Arlette",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-11839-0_2",
language = "English",
volume = "8749",
pages = "16--29",
journal = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
issn = "0302-9743",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

Human involvement in e-coaching : Effects on effectiveness, perceived influence and trust. / Kamphorst, Bart A.; Klein, Michel C A; van Wissen, Arlette.

In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8749, 2014, p. 16-29.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human involvement in e-coaching

T2 - Effects on effectiveness, perceived influence and trust

AU - Kamphorst, Bart A.

AU - Klein, Michel C A

AU - van Wissen, Arlette

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Coaching practices are rapidly changing due to advances in pervasive computing: behavior of coachees can unobtrusively be monitored in real time, and coaching can be remote or even fully automated. Fully autonomous e-coaching systems hold promise for improving people’s self-management, but also raise questions about the importance of human involvement in the e-coaching process. This paper describes an empirical ‘Wizard of Oz’ study in which coachees (N=82) were coached to take the stairs by either another person (N=20) or the e-coaching system eMate. Crucially, some coachees were made to believe that they would receive one type of coaching (human or computerized), while in reality they received the other. Results show that the coaching was equally effective in all groups, but that people who believed to be coached by a human judged the coaching to be more influential. No difference was found between groups in how trustworthy coachees found their coaches.

AB - Coaching practices are rapidly changing due to advances in pervasive computing: behavior of coachees can unobtrusively be monitored in real time, and coaching can be remote or even fully automated. Fully autonomous e-coaching systems hold promise for improving people’s self-management, but also raise questions about the importance of human involvement in the e-coaching process. This paper describes an empirical ‘Wizard of Oz’ study in which coachees (N=82) were coached to take the stairs by either another person (N=20) or the e-coaching system eMate. Crucially, some coachees were made to believe that they would receive one type of coaching (human or computerized), while in reality they received the other. Results show that the coaching was equally effective in all groups, but that people who believed to be coached by a human judged the coaching to be more influential. No difference was found between groups in how trustworthy coachees found their coaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921854233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-11839-0_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-11839-0_2

M3 - Article

VL - 8749

SP - 16

EP - 29

JO - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

JF - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

SN - 0302-9743

ER -