Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation

Niels A. Kloosterman, Jan Willem de Gee, Markus Werkle-Bergner, Ulman Lindenberger, Douglas D. Garrett, Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Decision bias is traditionally conceptualized as an internal reference against which sensory evidence is compared. Instead, we show that individuals implement decision bias by shifting the rate of sensory evidence accumulation toward a decision bound. Participants performed a target detection task while we recorded EEG. We experimentally manipulated participants' decision criterion for reporting targets using different stimulus-response reward contingencies, inducing either a liberal or a conservative bias. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that a liberal strategy biased sensory evidence accumulation toward target-present choices. Moreover, a liberal bias resulted in stronger midfrontal pre-stimulus 2-6 Hz (theta) power and suppression of pre-stimulus 8-12 Hz (alpha) power in posterior cortex. Alpha suppression in turn was linked to the output activity in visual cortex, as expressed through 59-100 Hz (gamma) power. These findings show that observers can intentionally control cortical excitability to strategically bias evidence accumulation toward the decision bound that maximizes reward.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere37321
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournaleLife
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Electroencephalography
Target tracking
Reward
Visual Cortex
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • decision bias
  • drift diffusion modeling
  • electroencephalography
  • human
  • neural excitability
  • neural oscillations
  • neuroscience
  • perceptual decision-making

Cite this

Kloosterman, N. A., de Gee, J. W., Werkle-Bergner, M., Lindenberger, U., Garrett, D. D., & Fahrenfort, J. J. (2019). Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation. eLife, 8, 1-27. [e37321]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37321
Kloosterman, Niels A. ; de Gee, Jan Willem ; Werkle-Bergner, Markus ; Lindenberger, Ulman ; Garrett, Douglas D. ; Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus. / Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation. In: eLife. 2019 ; Vol. 8. pp. 1-27.
@article{a11b0123946e460cb80cd7d1829d2792,
title = "Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation",
abstract = "Decision bias is traditionally conceptualized as an internal reference against which sensory evidence is compared. Instead, we show that individuals implement decision bias by shifting the rate of sensory evidence accumulation toward a decision bound. Participants performed a target detection task while we recorded EEG. We experimentally manipulated participants' decision criterion for reporting targets using different stimulus-response reward contingencies, inducing either a liberal or a conservative bias. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that a liberal strategy biased sensory evidence accumulation toward target-present choices. Moreover, a liberal bias resulted in stronger midfrontal pre-stimulus 2-6 Hz (theta) power and suppression of pre-stimulus 8-12 Hz (alpha) power in posterior cortex. Alpha suppression in turn was linked to the output activity in visual cortex, as expressed through 59-100 Hz (gamma) power. These findings show that observers can intentionally control cortical excitability to strategically bias evidence accumulation toward the decision bound that maximizes reward.",
keywords = "decision bias, drift diffusion modeling, electroencephalography, human, neural excitability, neural oscillations, neuroscience, perceptual decision-making",
author = "Kloosterman, {Niels A.} and {de Gee}, {Jan Willem} and Markus Werkle-Bergner and Ulman Lindenberger and Garrett, {Douglas D.} and Fahrenfort, {Johannes Jacobus}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "6",
doi = "10.7554/eLife.37321",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--27",
journal = "eLife",
issn = "2050-084X",
publisher = "eLife Sciences Publications",

}

Kloosterman, NA, de Gee, JW, Werkle-Bergner, M, Lindenberger, U, Garrett, DD & Fahrenfort, JJ 2019, 'Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation' eLife, vol. 8, e37321, pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37321

Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation. / Kloosterman, Niels A.; de Gee, Jan Willem; Werkle-Bergner, Markus; Lindenberger, Ulman; Garrett, Douglas D.; Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus.

In: eLife, Vol. 8, e37321, 06.02.2019, p. 1-27.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation

AU - Kloosterman, Niels A.

AU - de Gee, Jan Willem

AU - Werkle-Bergner, Markus

AU - Lindenberger, Ulman

AU - Garrett, Douglas D.

AU - Fahrenfort, Johannes Jacobus

PY - 2019/2/6

Y1 - 2019/2/6

N2 - Decision bias is traditionally conceptualized as an internal reference against which sensory evidence is compared. Instead, we show that individuals implement decision bias by shifting the rate of sensory evidence accumulation toward a decision bound. Participants performed a target detection task while we recorded EEG. We experimentally manipulated participants' decision criterion for reporting targets using different stimulus-response reward contingencies, inducing either a liberal or a conservative bias. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that a liberal strategy biased sensory evidence accumulation toward target-present choices. Moreover, a liberal bias resulted in stronger midfrontal pre-stimulus 2-6 Hz (theta) power and suppression of pre-stimulus 8-12 Hz (alpha) power in posterior cortex. Alpha suppression in turn was linked to the output activity in visual cortex, as expressed through 59-100 Hz (gamma) power. These findings show that observers can intentionally control cortical excitability to strategically bias evidence accumulation toward the decision bound that maximizes reward.

AB - Decision bias is traditionally conceptualized as an internal reference against which sensory evidence is compared. Instead, we show that individuals implement decision bias by shifting the rate of sensory evidence accumulation toward a decision bound. Participants performed a target detection task while we recorded EEG. We experimentally manipulated participants' decision criterion for reporting targets using different stimulus-response reward contingencies, inducing either a liberal or a conservative bias. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that a liberal strategy biased sensory evidence accumulation toward target-present choices. Moreover, a liberal bias resulted in stronger midfrontal pre-stimulus 2-6 Hz (theta) power and suppression of pre-stimulus 8-12 Hz (alpha) power in posterior cortex. Alpha suppression in turn was linked to the output activity in visual cortex, as expressed through 59-100 Hz (gamma) power. These findings show that observers can intentionally control cortical excitability to strategically bias evidence accumulation toward the decision bound that maximizes reward.

KW - decision bias

KW - drift diffusion modeling

KW - electroencephalography

KW - human

KW - neural excitability

KW - neural oscillations

KW - neuroscience

KW - perceptual decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061114620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061114620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7554/eLife.37321

DO - 10.7554/eLife.37321

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 27

JO - eLife

JF - eLife

SN - 2050-084X

M1 - e37321

ER -

Kloosterman NA, de Gee JW, Werkle-Bergner M, Lindenberger U, Garrett DD, Fahrenfort JJ. Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation. eLife. 2019 Feb 6;8:1-27. e37321. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37321