Hybridity, coping mechanisms, and academic performance management: Comparing three countries

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recent developments in the higher education sectors of the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK concerning accountability and performance measurement in research have resulted in a variety of responses from individual academics. The concept of hybridity enables us to explain these developments over time. Our longitudinal data consisted of 100 interviews in 2007 and 2011. There are more managerial and performance-oriented measures at the organizational level, involving a stronger output orientation and increased formalization, leading to an altered research culture. At the individual level, the focus on output appraisal expands the potential importance of sanctions, making managerial and professional tasks more connected. The concept of hybridity at the organizational and the individual levels places our theoretically developed coping mechanisms in a more dynamic perspective. This has elaborated our understanding of how academics cope with performance management, within their institutional and national contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-323
JournalPublic Administration
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

coping
management
performance
performance measurement
formalization
sanction
Sweden
Netherlands
responsibility
interview
education
time

Cite this

@article{99db9769f6fd4d3fa99eed0ea4d6f286,
title = "Hybridity, coping mechanisms, and academic performance management: Comparing three countries",
abstract = "Recent developments in the higher education sectors of the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK concerning accountability and performance measurement in research have resulted in a variety of responses from individual academics. The concept of hybridity enables us to explain these developments over time. Our longitudinal data consisted of 100 interviews in 2007 and 2011. There are more managerial and performance-oriented measures at the organizational level, involving a stronger output orientation and increased formalization, leading to an altered research culture. At the individual level, the focus on output appraisal expands the potential importance of sanctions, making managerial and professional tasks more connected. The concept of hybridity at the organizational and the individual levels places our theoretically developed coping mechanisms in a more dynamic perspective. This has elaborated our understanding of how academics cope with performance management, within their institutional and national contexts.",
author = "J.C. Teelken",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/padm.12138",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "307--323",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Hybridity, coping mechanisms, and academic performance management: Comparing three countries. / Teelken, J.C.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2015, p. 307-323.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hybridity, coping mechanisms, and academic performance management: Comparing three countries

AU - Teelken, J.C.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Recent developments in the higher education sectors of the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK concerning accountability and performance measurement in research have resulted in a variety of responses from individual academics. The concept of hybridity enables us to explain these developments over time. Our longitudinal data consisted of 100 interviews in 2007 and 2011. There are more managerial and performance-oriented measures at the organizational level, involving a stronger output orientation and increased formalization, leading to an altered research culture. At the individual level, the focus on output appraisal expands the potential importance of sanctions, making managerial and professional tasks more connected. The concept of hybridity at the organizational and the individual levels places our theoretically developed coping mechanisms in a more dynamic perspective. This has elaborated our understanding of how academics cope with performance management, within their institutional and national contexts.

AB - Recent developments in the higher education sectors of the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK concerning accountability and performance measurement in research have resulted in a variety of responses from individual academics. The concept of hybridity enables us to explain these developments over time. Our longitudinal data consisted of 100 interviews in 2007 and 2011. There are more managerial and performance-oriented measures at the organizational level, involving a stronger output orientation and increased formalization, leading to an altered research culture. At the individual level, the focus on output appraisal expands the potential importance of sanctions, making managerial and professional tasks more connected. The concept of hybridity at the organizational and the individual levels places our theoretically developed coping mechanisms in a more dynamic perspective. This has elaborated our understanding of how academics cope with performance management, within their institutional and national contexts.

U2 - 10.1111/padm.12138

DO - 10.1111/padm.12138

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 307

EP - 323

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 2

ER -