‘I Am Not a Conspiracy Theorist’: Relational Identifications in the Dutch Conspiracy Milieu

J. Harambam, S. Aupers

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.Despite their popularity and normalization, the public image of conspiracy theory remains morally tainted. Academics contribute by conceiving of conspiracy theorists as a coherent collective: internal variety is sacrificed for a clear external demarcation. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in the Netherlands, we explore variation in the conspiracy milieu through people’s own self-understanding. More particularly, we study how these people identify with and distinguish themselves from others. The analysis shows that they actively resist their stigmatization as ‘conspiracy theorists’ by distinguishing themselves from the mainstream as ‘critical freethinkers’. The trope ‘I am not a conspiracy theorist’ is used to reclaim rationality by labelling others within the conspiracy milieu the ‘real’ conspiracy theorists. Secondly, their ideas of self and other make three groups apparent: ‘activists’, ‘retreaters’ and ‘mediators’. Conspiracy culture, we conclude, is not one monolithic whole, but rather a network of different groups of people, identifying with different worldviews, beliefs, and practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-129
JournalCultural Sociology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘I Am Not a Conspiracy Theorist’: Relational Identifications in the Dutch Conspiracy Milieu'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this