I collegianti nell'Olanda del Seicento. Idee e pratiche della tolleranza

Translated title of the contribution: Religion is made a Hotch potch, and as it were tost in a Blanquet, and too many places of England too much Amsterdamnified by severall opinions

Francesco Quatrin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This essay examines the history of the Collegiant movement in the Netherlands in the seventeenth century. The Collegiants played a fundamental role in the cultural life of the Dutch Republic but have received only limited attention in historiography. Based on a comparative approach between two of the most important Collegiant groups in the cities of Amsterdam and Rotterdam, this essay offers new perspectives on their history It first examines where the Collegiants met, how many times a week, how many people attended their meetings, and the social and religious backgrounds of the participants. It then focuses on the number of women who attended these meetings and their role in defending them against the hostility of the Dutch Reformed Church. Lastly, it analyses the organisation and practices of the Collegiant meetings and argues that they contributed to the creation of a religious public sphere based on freedom of expression and tolerance.

Translated title of the contributionReligion is made a Hotch potch, and as it were tost in a Blanquet, and too many places of England too much Amsterdamnified by severall opinions
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)261-295
Number of pages35
JournalStudi storici
Volume66
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Carocci Editore S.p.A.

Keywords

  • Freedom of expression
  • Nonconformist movements
  • Nonconformist women
  • Religious dissent
  • Tolerance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Religion is made a Hotch potch, and as it were tost in a Blanquet, and too many places of England too much Amsterdamnified by severall opinions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this