Ideology, Doping and the Spirit of Sport

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The current World Anti-doping Code can be characterised as a tough approach to doping. In this paper we investigate how the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) justifies this tough approach. To this end, WADA advances two justificatory arguments. It maintains, first, that protection of the spirit of sport warrants tough measures and, second, that athletes have voluntarily consented to the Code. We argue that in the way they are presented by WADA, neither of these arguments can withstand scrutiny. In the second part of the paper, we go on to show that these arguments are in fact ideological in nature. The specific aim of these arguments is not to be correct, but rather to distort social reality, because in this way they can be used to ward off any critical discussion of the Code. We conclude that WADA’s interest is to create a façade of justice, not in serving justice itself.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-271
Number of pages17
JournalSport, Ethics and Philosophy
Volume12
Issue number3
Early online date26 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2018

Keywords

  • Doping
  • Quigley case
  • ideology
  • spirit of sport
  • voluntariness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ideology, Doping and the Spirit of Sport'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this