TY - JOUR
T1 - 'I am happy to be listened to': co-creation of a simple tool to measure women's experiences of respectful maternity care in urban Tanzania
AU - Sequeira D'mello, Brenda
AU - Housseine, Natasha
AU - Kidanto, Hussein Lesio
AU - Maaløe, Nanna
AU - van Roosmalen, Jos
AU - Meyrowitsch, Dan Wolf
AU - van den Akker, Thomas
AU - Muniro, Zainab
AU - Polin, Evance
AU - Ambokile, Nuswe
AU - Festo, Charles
AU - Sørensen, Jane Brandt
AU - Sando, David
PY - 2024/12/31
Y1 - 2024/12/31
N2 - BACKGROUND: Rights-based Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) is crucial for quality of care and improved birth outcomes, yet RMC measurements are rarely included in facility improvement initiatives. We aimed to (i) co-create a routine RMC measurement tool (RMC-T) for congested maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and (ii) assess the RMC-T's acceptability among women and healthcare stakeholders. METHOD: We employed a participatory approach utilizing multiple mixed methods. This included a scoping review, stakeholder engagement involving postnatal women, healthcare providers, health leadership, and global researchers through interviews, focus groups, and two surveys involving 201 and 838 postnatal women. Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis were conducted for validation using Stata 15. Theories of social practice and Thematic Framework of Acceptability guided the assessment of stakeholder priorities and tool acceptability. RESULTS: The multi-phased iterative co-creation process produced the 25-question RMC-T that measures satisfaction, communication, mistreatment (including physical, verbal, and sexual abuse; neglect; discrimination; lack of privacy; unconsented care; post-birth clean-up; informal payments; and denial of care), supportive care (such as food intake and mobility), birth companionship, post-procedure pain relief, bed-sharing, and newborn respect. The pragmatic validation process prioritized stakeholder feedback over strict statistics, lowering Cronbach's alpha from 0.70 in version 1 to 0.57 for the RMC-T. Women valued the opportunity to share their experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The RMC-T is contextualized, validated, and acceptable for measuring women's experiences of RMC. Routine use in facility-based quality improvement initiatives, along with targeted actions to address gaps, will advance rights-based RMC. Further validation and community-based studies are needed.
AB - BACKGROUND: Rights-based Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) is crucial for quality of care and improved birth outcomes, yet RMC measurements are rarely included in facility improvement initiatives. We aimed to (i) co-create a routine RMC measurement tool (RMC-T) for congested maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and (ii) assess the RMC-T's acceptability among women and healthcare stakeholders. METHOD: We employed a participatory approach utilizing multiple mixed methods. This included a scoping review, stakeholder engagement involving postnatal women, healthcare providers, health leadership, and global researchers through interviews, focus groups, and two surveys involving 201 and 838 postnatal women. Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis were conducted for validation using Stata 15. Theories of social practice and Thematic Framework of Acceptability guided the assessment of stakeholder priorities and tool acceptability. RESULTS: The multi-phased iterative co-creation process produced the 25-question RMC-T that measures satisfaction, communication, mistreatment (including physical, verbal, and sexual abuse; neglect; discrimination; lack of privacy; unconsented care; post-birth clean-up; informal payments; and denial of care), supportive care (such as food intake and mobility), birth companionship, post-procedure pain relief, bed-sharing, and newborn respect. The pragmatic validation process prioritized stakeholder feedback over strict statistics, lowering Cronbach's alpha from 0.70 in version 1 to 0.57 for the RMC-T. Women valued the opportunity to share their experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The RMC-T is contextualized, validated, and acceptable for measuring women's experiences of RMC. Routine use in facility-based quality improvement initiatives, along with targeted actions to address gaps, will advance rights-based RMC. Further validation and community-based studies are needed.
KW - Dar es Salaam
KW - disrespect and abuse
KW - experience of care
KW - measurement tool
KW - mistreatment
KW - Person-centered maternity care
KW - respectful maternity care
KW - urban health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205084339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205084339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/16549716.2024.2403972
DO - 10.1080/16549716.2024.2403972
M3 - Article
C2 - 39314117
AN - SCOPUS:85205084339
SN - 1654-9880
VL - 17
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Global Health Action
JF - Global Health Action
IS - 1
M1 - 2403972
ER -