Illuminating the relative dominance of awareness and pervasiveness over visibility in organizational ICT affordances

Ward van Zoonen*, Ronald Rice, Anu Sivunen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Contemporary discourse on the affordances of organizational information and communication technologies (ICTs) has largely been captivated by the allure of visibility. This article challenges that glare by elucidating the overlooked yet pivotal roles of a set of other organizational ICT affordances. Through a dominance analysis, our findings illuminate that awareness—the capacity of ICTs to link information and actors in an ongoing digital tapestry—and pervasiveness—the widespread nature, across time and space, of digital content and interactions—hold greater explanatory power compared to visibility in understanding some types of interactions fostered by ICTs (communication frequency, information-sharing quality at work [within and across departments], and identity processes [departmental and organizational]). By spotlighting the explanatory strength of affordances such as awareness and pervasiveness and somewhat dimming the role of visibility, this study urges scholars and practitioners alike to broaden their focus on the affordances of media in the digital workplace.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberzmaf006
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date5 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association.

Keywords

  • affordances
  • communication
  • dominance analysis
  • identification
  • information quality
  • organizational ICTs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Illuminating the relative dominance of awareness and pervasiveness over visibility in organizational ICT affordances'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this