Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of guideline implementation on patient care: A cluster RCT

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In Western European countries, dentists use standardized procedures, rather than individualized risk assessment, for routine oral examinations. The predictive hypothesis was that guideline implementation strategies based on multifaceted interventions would be more effective in patient care than the dissemination of guidelines only. A cluster-randomized trial was conducted, with groups of general dental practitioners (GDPs) as the unit of randomization. Patients were clustered within practices and prospectively enrolled in the trial. Patient data were collected from registration forms. The primary outcome measure was guideline-adherent recall assignment, and a secondary outcome measure was guideline-adherent bitewing frequency. The interventions consisted of online training, guideline dissemination, and educational sessions. For low-risk patients, guideline-adherent recall increased in the intervention group (+8%), which differed from the control group (-6.1%) (p = 0.01). Guideline-adherent bitewings showed mixed results. We conclude that multifaceted intervention had a moderate but relevant effect on the performance of GDPs, which is consistent with other findings in primary care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-76
JournalJournal of Dental Research
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of guideline implementation on patient care: A cluster RCT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this