Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon

Rayane Ali, Felicity L. Brown, Kerrie Stevenson, Mark Jordans, Karine Taha, Mounif El Amine, Frederik Steen, Bassel Meksassi, Joseph Elias, May Aoun, Bayard Roberts, Marit Sijbrandij, Pim Cuijpers, Aemal Akhtar, Aiysha Malik, Aniek Woodward, Daniela C. Fuhr*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

There has been an increase in the evaluation and implementation of non-specialist delivered psychological interventions to address unmet mental health needs in humanitarian emergencies. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide important evidence about intervention impact, complementary qualitative process evaluations are essential to understand key implementation processes and inform future scaling up of the intervention. This study was conducted as part of an RCT of the Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions (EASE) psychological intervention for young adolescents with elevated psychological distress (predominantly with a Syrian refugee background) in Lebanon. Our aims were firstly to conduct a qualitative process evaluation to understand stakeholder experiences and perceived impact of the intervention and identify barriers and facilitators for implementation, and secondly to explore considerations for scaling up. Eleven key informant interviews and seven focus groups were conducted with 39 respondents including adolescent and caregiver participants, trainers, providers, outreach workers, and local stakeholders. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Respondents perceived the intervention to be highly needed and reported improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Key implementation factors that have potential to influence engagement, adherence, and perceived impact included the socio-economic situation of families, mental health stigma, coordination within and between sectors (particularly for scaling up), embedding the intervention within existing service pathways, having clear quality and accountability processes including training and supervision for non-specialists, and sustainable funding. Our findings provide important context for understanding effectiveness outcomes of the RCT and highlights factors that need to be considered when implementing a mental health intervention on a larger scale in a complex crisis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-394
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
Volume51
Issue number3
Early online date12 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We would like to express our great appreciation to all adolescents, caregivers, providers, trainers, outreach staff, and stakeholders who gave their time to this research and shared their valuable and insightful inputs regarding their experiences with the intervention. We appreciate the efforts of the research assistant team who conducted all interviews, including in challenging circumstances. Lastly, we acknowledge that this work would not have been possible without the support of the full team at War Child in Lebanon and the Netherlands. This study is part of the STRENGTHS consortium. The STRENGTHS project is funded under Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020); 733337. The content of this article reflects only the authors’ views, and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Funding

We would like to express our great appreciation to all adolescents, caregivers, providers, trainers, outreach staff, and stakeholders who gave their time to this research and shared their valuable and insightful inputs regarding their experiences with the intervention. We appreciate the efforts of the research assistant team who conducted all interviews, including in challenging circumstances. Lastly, we acknowledge that this work would not have been possible without the support of the full team at War Child in Lebanon and the Netherlands. This study is part of the STRENGTHS consortium. The STRENGTHS project is funded under Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020); 733337. The content of this article reflects only the authors’ views, and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020733337
Horizon 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing a Non-Specialist Delivered Psychological Intervention for Young Adolescents in a Protracted Refugee Setting: a Qualitative Process Evaluation in Lebanon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this