Abstract
Involuntary care in intellectual disability care may be reduced by deployment of multidisciplinary consultation. The Multi-Disciplinary Expertise Team (MDET) method proved effective in a previous trial on increasing involuntary care reduction. The current study aimed to examine how four organizations adapted MDET during implementation, and tested whether these versions were also effective. Semi-structured interviews with MDET-coordinators were analyzed using the Framework Reporting Adaptions and Modifications-Expanded. A quasi-experimental interrupted time-series design tested change in weekly counts of involuntary care recordings from before to during MDET implementation, in care homes that implemented MDET ( n = 24) compared to care homes providing care-as-usual (CAU). Adaptations to MDET varied. These included implementing MDET without an independent MDET-team and loosening recordings of involuntary care. No differential changes in recordings were found between the implementation- and CAU-groups. Scaling-out MDET to other organizations led to adaptations that may have undermined its effects on reducing involuntary care.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 17446295241307061 |
Journal | Journal of Intellectual Disabilities |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 9 Dec 2024 |
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Scientific Research Foundation\u2019s Heeren Loo [grant number 2190200]; ZonMw [grant number 80-84500-98-402].
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Scientific Research Foundation’s Heeren Loo | 2190200 |
ZonMw | 80-84500-98-402 |
ZonMw |