Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science

Serena Does, Naomi Ellemers, John F. Dovidio, Jasmine B. Norman, Avital Mentovich, Romy van der Lee, Phillip Atiba Goff

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Long-standing research traditions in psychology have established the fundamental impact of social categories, such as race and gender, on people's perceptions of themselves and others, as well as on the general human cognition and behavior. However, there is a general tendency to ignore research staff demographics (e.g., researchers' race and gender) in research development and research reports. Variation in research staff demographics can exert systematic and scientifically informative influences on results from psychological research. Consequently, research staff demographics need to be considered, studied, and/or reported, along with how these demographics were allowed to vary across participants or conditions (e.g., random assignment, matched with participant demographics, or included as a factor in the experimental design). In addition to providing an overview of multidisciplinary evidence of research staff demographics effects, we discuss how research staff demographics might influence research findings through (a) ingroup versus outgroup effects, (b) stereotype and (implicit) bias effects, and (c) priming and social tuning effects. Finally, an overview of recommended considerations is included (see the Appendix) to help illustrate how to systematically incorporate relevant research staff demographics in psychological science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-650
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume73
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Demography
Psychology
Research
Cognition
Research Design
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Demographics
  • Experimenter effects
  • Generalizability
  • Intergroup processes
  • Validity

Cite this

Does, S., Ellemers, N., Dovidio, J. F., Norman, J. B., Mentovich, A., van der Lee, R., & Goff, P. A. (Accepted/In press). Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science. American Psychologist, 73(5), 639-650. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000199
Does, Serena ; Ellemers, Naomi ; Dovidio, John F. ; Norman, Jasmine B. ; Mentovich, Avital ; van der Lee, Romy ; Goff, Phillip Atiba. / Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science. In: American Psychologist. 2018 ; Vol. 73, No. 5. pp. 639-650.
@article{48ed85e499a940a19ec8cb10aaca099d,
title = "Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science",
abstract = "Long-standing research traditions in psychology have established the fundamental impact of social categories, such as race and gender, on people's perceptions of themselves and others, as well as on the general human cognition and behavior. However, there is a general tendency to ignore research staff demographics (e.g., researchers' race and gender) in research development and research reports. Variation in research staff demographics can exert systematic and scientifically informative influences on results from psychological research. Consequently, research staff demographics need to be considered, studied, and/or reported, along with how these demographics were allowed to vary across participants or conditions (e.g., random assignment, matched with participant demographics, or included as a factor in the experimental design). In addition to providing an overview of multidisciplinary evidence of research staff demographics effects, we discuss how research staff demographics might influence research findings through (a) ingroup versus outgroup effects, (b) stereotype and (implicit) bias effects, and (c) priming and social tuning effects. Finally, an overview of recommended considerations is included (see the Appendix) to help illustrate how to systematically incorporate relevant research staff demographics in psychological science.",
keywords = "Demographics, Experimenter effects, Generalizability, Intergroup processes, Validity",
author = "Serena Does and Naomi Ellemers and Dovidio, {John F.} and Norman, {Jasmine B.} and Avital Mentovich and {van der Lee}, Romy and Goff, {Phillip Atiba}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/amp0000199",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "639--650",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "5",

}

Does, S, Ellemers, N, Dovidio, JF, Norman, JB, Mentovich, A, van der Lee, R & Goff, PA 2018, 'Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science' American Psychologist, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 639-650. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000199

Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science. / Does, Serena; Ellemers, Naomi; Dovidio, John F.; Norman, Jasmine B.; Mentovich, Avital; van der Lee, Romy; Goff, Phillip Atiba.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 73, No. 5, 01.03.2018, p. 639-650.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implications of research staff demographics for psychological science

AU - Does, Serena

AU - Ellemers, Naomi

AU - Dovidio, John F.

AU - Norman, Jasmine B.

AU - Mentovich, Avital

AU - van der Lee, Romy

AU - Goff, Phillip Atiba

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Long-standing research traditions in psychology have established the fundamental impact of social categories, such as race and gender, on people's perceptions of themselves and others, as well as on the general human cognition and behavior. However, there is a general tendency to ignore research staff demographics (e.g., researchers' race and gender) in research development and research reports. Variation in research staff demographics can exert systematic and scientifically informative influences on results from psychological research. Consequently, research staff demographics need to be considered, studied, and/or reported, along with how these demographics were allowed to vary across participants or conditions (e.g., random assignment, matched with participant demographics, or included as a factor in the experimental design). In addition to providing an overview of multidisciplinary evidence of research staff demographics effects, we discuss how research staff demographics might influence research findings through (a) ingroup versus outgroup effects, (b) stereotype and (implicit) bias effects, and (c) priming and social tuning effects. Finally, an overview of recommended considerations is included (see the Appendix) to help illustrate how to systematically incorporate relevant research staff demographics in psychological science.

AB - Long-standing research traditions in psychology have established the fundamental impact of social categories, such as race and gender, on people's perceptions of themselves and others, as well as on the general human cognition and behavior. However, there is a general tendency to ignore research staff demographics (e.g., researchers' race and gender) in research development and research reports. Variation in research staff demographics can exert systematic and scientifically informative influences on results from psychological research. Consequently, research staff demographics need to be considered, studied, and/or reported, along with how these demographics were allowed to vary across participants or conditions (e.g., random assignment, matched with participant demographics, or included as a factor in the experimental design). In addition to providing an overview of multidisciplinary evidence of research staff demographics effects, we discuss how research staff demographics might influence research findings through (a) ingroup versus outgroup effects, (b) stereotype and (implicit) bias effects, and (c) priming and social tuning effects. Finally, an overview of recommended considerations is included (see the Appendix) to help illustrate how to systematically incorporate relevant research staff demographics in psychological science.

KW - Demographics

KW - Experimenter effects

KW - Generalizability

KW - Intergroup processes

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042559847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042559847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/amp0000199

DO - 10.1037/amp0000199

M3 - Article

VL - 73

SP - 639

EP - 650

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 5

ER -