Implicit and explicit learning in reactive and voluntary saccade adaptation

Daniel Marten Van Es, Tomas Knapen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Saccades can either be elicited automatically by salient peripheral stimuli or can additionally depend on explicit cognitive goals. Similarly, it is thought that motor adaptation is driven by the combination of a more automatic, implicit process and a more explicit, cognitive process. However, the degree to which such implicit and explicit learning contribute to the adaptation of more reactive and voluntary saccades remains elusive. To study this question, we employed a global saccadic adaptation paradigm with both increasing and decreasing saccade amplitudes. We assessed the resulting adaptation using a dual state model of motor adaptation. This model decomposes learning into a fast and slow process, which are thought to constitute explicit and implicit learning, respectively. Our results show that adaptation of reactive saccades is equally driven by fast and slow learning, while fast learning is nearly absent when adapting voluntary (i.e. scanning) saccades. This pattern of results was present both when saccade gain was increased or decreased. Our results suggest that the increased cognitive demands associated with voluntary compared to reactive saccade planning interfere specifically with explicit learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0203248
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Eye movements
Saccades
learning
Learning
cognition
planning
Scanning
Planning

Cite this

@article{46c525bbce224268ac6a1c7b6c9cac2a,
title = "Implicit and explicit learning in reactive and voluntary saccade adaptation",
abstract = "Saccades can either be elicited automatically by salient peripheral stimuli or can additionally depend on explicit cognitive goals. Similarly, it is thought that motor adaptation is driven by the combination of a more automatic, implicit process and a more explicit, cognitive process. However, the degree to which such implicit and explicit learning contribute to the adaptation of more reactive and voluntary saccades remains elusive. To study this question, we employed a global saccadic adaptation paradigm with both increasing and decreasing saccade amplitudes. We assessed the resulting adaptation using a dual state model of motor adaptation. This model decomposes learning into a fast and slow process, which are thought to constitute explicit and implicit learning, respectively. Our results show that adaptation of reactive saccades is equally driven by fast and slow learning, while fast learning is nearly absent when adapting voluntary (i.e. scanning) saccades. This pattern of results was present both when saccade gain was increased or decreased. Our results suggest that the increased cognitive demands associated with voluntary compared to reactive saccade planning interfere specifically with explicit learning.",
author = "{Van Es}, {Daniel Marten} and Tomas Knapen",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0203248",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "1",

}

Implicit and explicit learning in reactive and voluntary saccade adaptation. / Van Es, Daniel Marten; Knapen, Tomas.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 1, e0203248, 16.01.2019, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit and explicit learning in reactive and voluntary saccade adaptation

AU - Van Es, Daniel Marten

AU - Knapen, Tomas

PY - 2019/1/16

Y1 - 2019/1/16

N2 - Saccades can either be elicited automatically by salient peripheral stimuli or can additionally depend on explicit cognitive goals. Similarly, it is thought that motor adaptation is driven by the combination of a more automatic, implicit process and a more explicit, cognitive process. However, the degree to which such implicit and explicit learning contribute to the adaptation of more reactive and voluntary saccades remains elusive. To study this question, we employed a global saccadic adaptation paradigm with both increasing and decreasing saccade amplitudes. We assessed the resulting adaptation using a dual state model of motor adaptation. This model decomposes learning into a fast and slow process, which are thought to constitute explicit and implicit learning, respectively. Our results show that adaptation of reactive saccades is equally driven by fast and slow learning, while fast learning is nearly absent when adapting voluntary (i.e. scanning) saccades. This pattern of results was present both when saccade gain was increased or decreased. Our results suggest that the increased cognitive demands associated with voluntary compared to reactive saccade planning interfere specifically with explicit learning.

AB - Saccades can either be elicited automatically by salient peripheral stimuli or can additionally depend on explicit cognitive goals. Similarly, it is thought that motor adaptation is driven by the combination of a more automatic, implicit process and a more explicit, cognitive process. However, the degree to which such implicit and explicit learning contribute to the adaptation of more reactive and voluntary saccades remains elusive. To study this question, we employed a global saccadic adaptation paradigm with both increasing and decreasing saccade amplitudes. We assessed the resulting adaptation using a dual state model of motor adaptation. This model decomposes learning into a fast and slow process, which are thought to constitute explicit and implicit learning, respectively. Our results show that adaptation of reactive saccades is equally driven by fast and slow learning, while fast learning is nearly absent when adapting voluntary (i.e. scanning) saccades. This pattern of results was present both when saccade gain was increased or decreased. Our results suggest that the increased cognitive demands associated with voluntary compared to reactive saccade planning interfere specifically with explicit learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060080537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060080537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0203248

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0203248

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 1

M1 - e0203248

ER -