Improving theories of change in conservation projects

Craig Leisher*, Richard Bugan, Sarah Ngo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Theory of change has become a common tool in project design because it helps teams agree on hypothesized causal pathways to a desired goal and examine their underlying assumptions. Yet, a consensus has not emerged on the specific steps and components of a theory of change. What constitutes a theory of change? Using 22 theory of change publications, we did a structured analysis of the components of a theory of change. Where there was substantial agreement among the publications on a specific component of a theory of change, we included it in the first iteration of our approach. We then ordered the components in a logical sequence, developed guidance for each component, tested them with project teams, and revised them in an iterative process. We tested and refined our guidance over 3 years with 73 teams from 18 countries. Here, we share our learning and recommendations for those interested in developing a robust theory of change for a conservation project.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13248
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalConservation Science and Practice
Volume6
Issue number11
Early online date15 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

CONTRIBUTED PAPER

-------------------------------------------------

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s). Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords

  • assumptions
  • evidence
  • outcomes
  • project design
  • project planning
  • theory of change

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving theories of change in conservation projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this