Abstract
Theory of change has become a common tool in project design because it helps teams agree on hypothesized causal pathways to a desired goal and examine their underlying assumptions. Yet, a consensus has not emerged on the specific steps and components of a theory of change. What constitutes a theory of change? Using 22 theory of change publications, we did a structured analysis of the components of a theory of change. Where there was substantial agreement among the publications on a specific component of a theory of change, we included it in the first iteration of our approach. We then ordered the components in a logical sequence, developed guidance for each component, tested them with project teams, and revised them in an iterative process. We tested and refined our guidance over 3 years with 73 teams from 18 countries. Here, we share our learning and recommendations for those interested in developing a robust theory of change for a conservation project.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e13248 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Conservation Science and Practice |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 15 Oct 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2024 |
Bibliographical note
CONTRIBUTED PAPER-------------------------------------------------
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s). Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
Keywords
- assumptions
- evidence
- outcomes
- project design
- project planning
- theory of change