Abstract
Previous research highlighted the interpersonal benefits of self-control in professional contexts: People prefer high self-control individuals as work or study partners and expect them to perform better than low self-control individuals. We show that these benefits of self-control reverse in the artistic domain. Results of one pilot study and five preregistered online experiments (N = 1644) reveal that artists with high (vs. low) self-control are perceived as less creative. This effect replicates across various artistic domains (visual art, music, poetry, screenwriting), holds for both male and female artists and can be explained by perceptions of lower experiential processing, which is considered indispensable for creativity. However, art created by high (vs. low) self-control artists is ascribed higher market value due to stronger attributions of productivity. These findings provide novel insights into the social perception of self-control and contribute to the understudied topic of the downsides of self-control as well as to the literature on lay theories of creativity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | European Journal of Social Psychology |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s). European Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Funding
The authors would like to acknowledge support for data collection from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (Research Participation Project of the School of Business and Economics) and Tilburg University. The authors thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, as well as Katherine Du and participants of research seminars at the University of Groningen and Vilnius University for helpful feedback.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Universiteit van Tilburg |
Keywords
- arts
- creativity
- experiential processing
- lay theories
- rational processing
- self-control
- social perception