In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets

Corné van Dooren, Harry Aiking, Pier Vellinga

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to identify a set of crucial indicators to assess the most pressing environmental impacts of diets. Methods: Based on a literature review, 55 potential assessment methods were selected and their distinctive indicators identified. The methods were classified according to their position in the DPSIR framework [chain of Drivers, Pressures, State (changes), Impacts, and Responses], and into 15 environmental issues at three levels. The selection was narrowed down to eight, based on the availability of reliable methods, their relevance to agri-food systems, their frequent application for diets, and their recommendation by international bodies. Results and discussion: (1) At the global (supra) level, the planetary boundaries approach addresses the current global environmental (change in) state and helps to prioritize the most pressing issues related to the agri-food system as a driver. These issues are climate change, nitrogen and phosphorus cycle disruption, land-use change, and freshwater use. (2) At the national (macro) level, the footprints approach is used to identify indicators. This footprint family includes ecological, land, carbon, energy, and water footprints. International bodies support these key indicators, but they recommend complementary assessment methods for nitrogen and phosphorus flows, soil health, and pesticide use. (3) At the product (micro) level, life cycle assessment includes 11 pressure indicators. Of the latter, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and land use (LU) are the most frequently used indicators in diet studies. Conclusions: We conclude that GHGEs and LU fulfill the selection criteria and address most of the environmental impact of diets well. In the future, these indicators should be supplemented with an indicator addressing the nitrogen and phosphorous efficiency of food products.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1297-1314
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume23
Issue number6
Early online date2 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

environmental impact
diet
assessment method
footprint
greenhouse gas
phosphorus cycle
water footprint
land use
nitrogen cycle
food
indicator
nitrogen
literature review
environmental issue
land use change
environmental change
life cycle
pesticide
phosphorus
climate change

Keywords

  • Ecological footprint
  • Environmental indicators
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Planetary boundaries
  • Sustainable diet

Cite this

@article{6ed6db3ec6fd4435b1d95b661d461a74,
title = "In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this paper is to identify a set of crucial indicators to assess the most pressing environmental impacts of diets. Methods: Based on a literature review, 55 potential assessment methods were selected and their distinctive indicators identified. The methods were classified according to their position in the DPSIR framework [chain of Drivers, Pressures, State (changes), Impacts, and Responses], and into 15 environmental issues at three levels. The selection was narrowed down to eight, based on the availability of reliable methods, their relevance to agri-food systems, their frequent application for diets, and their recommendation by international bodies. Results and discussion: (1) At the global (supra) level, the planetary boundaries approach addresses the current global environmental (change in) state and helps to prioritize the most pressing issues related to the agri-food system as a driver. These issues are climate change, nitrogen and phosphorus cycle disruption, land-use change, and freshwater use. (2) At the national (macro) level, the footprints approach is used to identify indicators. This footprint family includes ecological, land, carbon, energy, and water footprints. International bodies support these key indicators, but they recommend complementary assessment methods for nitrogen and phosphorus flows, soil health, and pesticide use. (3) At the product (micro) level, life cycle assessment includes 11 pressure indicators. Of the latter, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and land use (LU) are the most frequently used indicators in diet studies. Conclusions: We conclude that GHGEs and LU fulfill the selection criteria and address most of the environmental impact of diets well. In the future, these indicators should be supplemented with an indicator addressing the nitrogen and phosphorous efficiency of food products.",
keywords = "Ecological footprint, Environmental indicators, Life cycle assessment, Planetary boundaries, Sustainable diet",
author = "{van Dooren}, Corn{\'e} and Harry Aiking and Pier Vellinga",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11367-017-1371-2",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1297--1314",
journal = "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment",
issn = "0948-3349",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "6",

}

In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets. / van Dooren, Corné; Aiking, Harry; Vellinga, Pier.

In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 23, No. 6, 06.2018, p. 1297-1314.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - In search of indicators to assess the environmental impact of diets

AU - van Dooren, Corné

AU - Aiking, Harry

AU - Vellinga, Pier

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to identify a set of crucial indicators to assess the most pressing environmental impacts of diets. Methods: Based on a literature review, 55 potential assessment methods were selected and their distinctive indicators identified. The methods were classified according to their position in the DPSIR framework [chain of Drivers, Pressures, State (changes), Impacts, and Responses], and into 15 environmental issues at three levels. The selection was narrowed down to eight, based on the availability of reliable methods, their relevance to agri-food systems, their frequent application for diets, and their recommendation by international bodies. Results and discussion: (1) At the global (supra) level, the planetary boundaries approach addresses the current global environmental (change in) state and helps to prioritize the most pressing issues related to the agri-food system as a driver. These issues are climate change, nitrogen and phosphorus cycle disruption, land-use change, and freshwater use. (2) At the national (macro) level, the footprints approach is used to identify indicators. This footprint family includes ecological, land, carbon, energy, and water footprints. International bodies support these key indicators, but they recommend complementary assessment methods for nitrogen and phosphorus flows, soil health, and pesticide use. (3) At the product (micro) level, life cycle assessment includes 11 pressure indicators. Of the latter, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and land use (LU) are the most frequently used indicators in diet studies. Conclusions: We conclude that GHGEs and LU fulfill the selection criteria and address most of the environmental impact of diets well. In the future, these indicators should be supplemented with an indicator addressing the nitrogen and phosphorous efficiency of food products.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to identify a set of crucial indicators to assess the most pressing environmental impacts of diets. Methods: Based on a literature review, 55 potential assessment methods were selected and their distinctive indicators identified. The methods were classified according to their position in the DPSIR framework [chain of Drivers, Pressures, State (changes), Impacts, and Responses], and into 15 environmental issues at three levels. The selection was narrowed down to eight, based on the availability of reliable methods, their relevance to agri-food systems, their frequent application for diets, and their recommendation by international bodies. Results and discussion: (1) At the global (supra) level, the planetary boundaries approach addresses the current global environmental (change in) state and helps to prioritize the most pressing issues related to the agri-food system as a driver. These issues are climate change, nitrogen and phosphorus cycle disruption, land-use change, and freshwater use. (2) At the national (macro) level, the footprints approach is used to identify indicators. This footprint family includes ecological, land, carbon, energy, and water footprints. International bodies support these key indicators, but they recommend complementary assessment methods for nitrogen and phosphorus flows, soil health, and pesticide use. (3) At the product (micro) level, life cycle assessment includes 11 pressure indicators. Of the latter, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs) and land use (LU) are the most frequently used indicators in diet studies. Conclusions: We conclude that GHGEs and LU fulfill the selection criteria and address most of the environmental impact of diets well. In the future, these indicators should be supplemented with an indicator addressing the nitrogen and phosphorous efficiency of food products.

KW - Ecological footprint

KW - Environmental indicators

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Planetary boundaries

KW - Sustainable diet

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026768601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026768601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11367-017-1371-2

DO - 10.1007/s11367-017-1371-2

M3 - Review article

VL - 23

SP - 1297

EP - 1314

JO - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

JF - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

SN - 0948-3349

IS - 6

ER -