Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

In situ short‐term responses of Amazonian understory plants to elevated CO2

  • Amanda Rayane Damasceno
  • , Sabrina Garcia
  • , Izabela Fonseca Aleixo
  • , Juliane Cristina Gomes Menezes
  • , Iokanam Sales Pereira
  • , Martin G. De Kauwe
  • , Vanessa Rodrigues Ferrer
  • , Katrin Fleischer
  • , Thorsten E. E. Grams
  • , Alacimar V. Guedes
  • , Iain Paul Hartley
  • , Bart Kruijt
  • , Laynara Figueiredo Lugli
  • , Nathielly Pires Martins
  • , Richard J. Norby
  • , Julyane Stephanie Pires‐Santos
  • , Bruno Takeshi Tanaka Portela
  • , Anja Rammig
  • , Leonardo Ramos de Oliveira
  • , Flávia Delgado Santana
  • Yago Rodrigues Santos, Crisvaldo Cássio Silva de Souza, Gabriela Ushida, David Montenegro Lapola, Carlos Alberto Nobre Quesada, Tomas Ferreira Domingues*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The response of plants to increasing atmospheric CO2 depends on the ecological context where the plants are found. Several experiments with elevated CO2 (eCO2) have been done worldwide, but the Amazonian forest understory has been neglected. As the central Amazon is limited by light and phosphorus, understanding how understory responds to eCO2 is important for foreseeing how the forest will function in the future. In the understory of a natural forest in the Central Amazon, we installed four open-top chambers as control replicates and another four under eCO2 (+250 ppm above ambient levels). Under eCO2, we observed increases in carbon assimilation rate (67%), maximum electron transport rate (19%), quantum yield (56%), and water use efficiency (78%). We also detected an increase in leaf area (51%) and stem diameter increment (65%). Central Amazon understory responded positively to eCO2 by increasing their ability to capture and use light and the extra primary productivity was allocated to supporting more leaf and conducting tissues. The increment in leaf area while maintaining transpiration rates suggests that the understory will increase its contribution to evapotranspiration. Therefore, this forest might be less resistant in the future to extreme drought, as no reduction in transpiration rates were detected.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1865-1876
Number of pages12
JournalPlant, Cell & Environment
Volume47
Issue number5
Early online date9 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Funding

The authors thank the AmazonFACE Program, the Brazilian Ministério de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação throgh its Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - FNDCT, the UK Government's Foreigh, Commonwealth and Development Office, the LBA Program, the National Institute for Amazonian Research (INPA), the Biogeochemical Cycles Laboratory (INPA) and all their collaborators for the general support in carrying out this study. This research was funded by the Serrapilheira Institute (Grant 1708-15574), with additional funds from Brazil's Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) (Grant CAPES-INPA/88881.154644/2017-01 and grant 23038.007722/2014-77). Sabrina Garcia, Carlos Alberto Nobre Quesada and Tomas Ferreira Domingues thank the United States Agency for International Development for funding via the PEER program (Grant Agreement AID-OAA-A-11- 00012). Tomas Ferreira Domingues, Carlos Alberto Quesada and David Lapola acknowledges the financial support from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) grants 312589/2022-0, 312866/2021-6 and 309074/2021-5 (Bolsa de produtividade em Pesquisa). Katrin Fleischer acknowledges grant IGSSE 12.10. The authors thank the AmazonFACE Program, the Brazilian Ministério de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação throgh its Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico ‐ FNDCT, the UK Government's Foreigh, Commonwealth and Development Office, the LBA Program, the National Institute for Amazonian Research (INPA), the Biogeochemical Cycles Laboratory (INPA) and all their collaborators for the general support in carrying out this study. This research was funded by the Serrapilheira Institute (Grant 1708‐15574), with additional funds from Brazil's Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) (Grant CAPES‐INPA/88881.154644/2017‐01 and grant 23038.007722/2014‐77). Sabrina Garcia, Carlos Alberto Nobre Quesada and Tomas Ferreira Domingues thank the United States Agency for International Development for funding via the PEER program (Grant Agreement AID‐OAA‐A‐11‐ 00012). Tomas Ferreira Domingues, Carlos Alberto Quesada and David Lapola acknowledges the financial support from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) grants 312589/2022‐0, 312866/2021‐6 and 309074/2021‐5 (Bolsa de produtividade em Pesquisa). Katrin Fleischer acknowledges grant IGSSE 12.10.

FundersFunder number
FNDCT
Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
National Institute for Amazonian Research
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
Biogeochemical Cycles Laboratory
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico312866/2021‐6, 312589/2022‐0, IGSSE 12.10
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior23038.007722/2014‐77, CAPES‐INPA/88881.154644/2017‐01
Instituto Serrapilheira1708‐15574
United States Agency for International DevelopmentAID‐OAA‐A‐11‐ 00012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In situ short‐term responses of Amazonian understory plants to elevated CO2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this