In the Name of Democracy: The Value of Democracy Explains Leniency Towards Wrongdoings as a Function of Group Political Organization

A. Pereira, J.M. Falomir-Pichastor, J. Berent, C. Staerklé, F. Butera

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    According to the "democracy-as-value" hypothesis, democracy has become an ideological belief system providing social value to democratic individuals, groups and institutions, granting legitimacy to their actions (even if dishonest or violent), and protecting them from consecutive punishments. The present research investigates the extent to which this legitimizing process is based on the individual endorsement of democratic principles. Across four experiments, following the misdeed of a (few) group member(s), respondents who valued democratic group organization and democracy in general expressed more lenient retributive justice judgments towards democratic (as compared with nondemocratic) offender groups. These findings shed light on the ways in which democratic ideology infuses justice judgments.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)191-203
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume42
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'In the Name of Democracy: The Value of Democracy Explains Leniency Towards Wrongdoings as a Function of Group Political Organization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this