TY - JOUR
T1 - In Two Minds: How Reflections Influence Software Architecture Design Thinking
T2 - how reflections influence software design thinking
AU - Razavian, Maryam
AU - Tang, Anthony
AU - Capilla, Rafael
AU - Lago, Patricia
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - We theorize a two-mind model of design thinking. Mind 1 is about logical design reasoning, and Mind 2 is about the reflection on our reasoning and judgments. The problem solving ability of Mind 1 has often been emphasized in software engineering. The reflective Mind 2, however, has not received much attention. In this study, we want to find out if Mind 2, or reflection, can improve design discourse, a prerequisite of design quality. We conducted multiple case studies with 12 student groups, divided into test groups and control groups. We provided external reflections to the test groups. No reflections were given to the control groups. We analyzed the quality of the design discourse in both groups. We found that reflection (Mind 2) improves the quality of design discourse (Mind 1) under certain preconditions. The results highlight the significance of reflection as a mean to improve the quality of design discourse. We conclude that software designers need both Mind 1 and Mind 2 to obtain a higher quality design discourse, as a foundation for a good design.
AB - We theorize a two-mind model of design thinking. Mind 1 is about logical design reasoning, and Mind 2 is about the reflection on our reasoning and judgments. The problem solving ability of Mind 1 has often been emphasized in software engineering. The reflective Mind 2, however, has not received much attention. In this study, we want to find out if Mind 2, or reflection, can improve design discourse, a prerequisite of design quality. We conducted multiple case studies with 12 student groups, divided into test groups and control groups. We provided external reflections to the test groups. No reflections were given to the control groups. We analyzed the quality of the design discourse in both groups. We found that reflection (Mind 2) improves the quality of design discourse (Mind 1) under certain preconditions. The results highlight the significance of reflection as a mean to improve the quality of design discourse. We conclude that software designers need both Mind 1 and Mind 2 to obtain a higher quality design discourse, as a foundation for a good design.
KW - behavioral software engineering
KW - design reasoning
KW - reflection
KW - software design
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84971350192
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971350192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/smr.1776
DO - 10.1002/smr.1776
M3 - Article
SN - 2047-7481
VL - 28
SP - 394
EP - 426
JO - Journal of Software: Evolution and process
JF - Journal of Software: Evolution and process
IS - 6
ER -