TY - JOUR
T1 - In vivo nerve identification in head and neck surgery using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
AU - Langhout, Gerrit C.
AU - Kuhlmann, Koert F.D.
AU - Schreuder, Pim
AU - Bydlon, Torre
AU - Smeele, Ludi E.
AU - van den Brekel, Michiel W.M.
AU - Sterenborg, Henricus J.C.M.
AU - Hendriks, Benno H.W.
AU - Ruers, Theo J.M.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: Careful identification of nerves during head and neck surgery is essential to prevent nerve damage. Currently, nerves are identified based on anatomy and appearance, optionally combined with electromyography (EMG). In challenging cases, nerve damage is reported in up to 50%. Recently, optical techniques, like diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) show potential to improve nerve identification. Methods: 212 intra-operative DRS/FS measurements were performed. Small nerve branches (1–3 mm), on near-nerve adipose tissue, muscle and subcutaneous fat were measured during 11 surgical procedures. Tissue identification was based on quantified concentrations of optical absorbers and scattering parameters. Results: Clinically comprehensive parameters showed significant differences (<0.05) between the tissues. Classification using k-Nearest Neighbor resulted in 100% sensitivity and a specificity of 83% (accuracy 91%), for the identification of nerve against surrounding tissues. Conclusions: DRS/FS is a potentially useful intraoperative tool for identification of nerves from adjacent tissues. Level of Evidence: Observational proof of principle study.
AB - Background: Careful identification of nerves during head and neck surgery is essential to prevent nerve damage. Currently, nerves are identified based on anatomy and appearance, optionally combined with electromyography (EMG). In challenging cases, nerve damage is reported in up to 50%. Recently, optical techniques, like diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and fluorescence spectroscopy (FS) show potential to improve nerve identification. Methods: 212 intra-operative DRS/FS measurements were performed. Small nerve branches (1–3 mm), on near-nerve adipose tissue, muscle and subcutaneous fat were measured during 11 surgical procedures. Tissue identification was based on quantified concentrations of optical absorbers and scattering parameters. Results: Clinically comprehensive parameters showed significant differences (<0.05) between the tissues. Classification using k-Nearest Neighbor resulted in 100% sensitivity and a specificity of 83% (accuracy 91%), for the identification of nerve against surrounding tissues. Conclusions: DRS/FS is a potentially useful intraoperative tool for identification of nerves from adjacent tissues. Level of Evidence: Observational proof of principle study.
U2 - 10.1002/lio2.174
DO - 10.1002/lio2.174
M3 - Article
C2 - 30410988
SN - 2378-8038
VL - 3
SP - 349
EP - 355
JO - Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
JF - Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
IS - 5
ER -