Inadequacies of the proportional duration model: Perspectives from a dynamical analysis of juggling

Peter J. Beek*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is argued that the proportional duration model provides an inadequate route into the problem of timing in skilled movements. It is theoretically shallow and lacks the predictive power to guide a research programme. An alternative, task-dynamical approach is proposed and exemplified in a study of relative timing in juggling. The adopted methodology emphasizes the need to first identify the major temporal constraints on the task and its key relative timing variable(s), and then to construct specific hypotheses regarding both the invariant and the variant properties of these relative timing variable(s).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-237
Number of pages11
JournalHuman Movement Science
Volume11
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1992

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
* The writing of this paper was supported in part by an NSF grant (BNS-8811SlOJ awarded to C.E.S.P.A., University of Connecticut. The author wishes to thank Bruce Abernethy, Wiero Beek, David Rosenbaum, Elliot Saltzman, and Piet van Wieringen for helpful comments. Author’s address: P.J. Beek, Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Free University, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inadequacies of the proportional duration model: Perspectives from a dynamical analysis of juggling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this