Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects

Christopher M. Raymond; Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras; Erik Andersson; Riley Andrade; Alberto Arroyo Schnell; Barbara Battioni Romanelli; Anna Filyushkina; Devin J. Goodson; Andra Horcea-Milcu; Dana N. Johnson; Rose Keller; Jan J. Kuiper; Veronica Lo; María D. López-Rodríguez; Hug March; Marc Metzger; Elisa Oteros-Rozas; Evan Salcido; My Sellberg; William Stewart; Isabel Ruiz-Mallén; Tobias Plieninger; Carena J. van Riper; Peter H. Verburg; Magdalena M. Wiedermann

doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008

Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects

Christopher M. Raymond^*
, Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras
, Erik Andersson
, Riley Andrade
, Alberto Arroyo Schnell
, Barbara Battioni Romanelli
, Anna Filyushkina
, Devin J. Goodson
, Andra Horcea-Milcu
, Dana N. Johnson
, Rose Keller
, Jan J. Kuiper
, Veronica Lo
, María D. López-Rodríguez
, Hug March
, Marc Metzger
, Elisa Oteros-Rozas
, Evan Salcido
, My Sellberg
, William Stewart

Isabel Ruiz-Mallén, Tobias Plieninger, Carena J. van Riper, Peter H. Verburg, Magdalena M. Wiedermann

^*Corresponding author for this work

Environmental Geography

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	252-264
Number of pages	13
Journal	One Earth
Volume	5
Issue number	3
Early online date	18 Mar 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008
Publication status	Published - 18 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
ENVISION was funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the support of the following national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development ( FORMAS, 2018-02429 ); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research ( BMBF ) ( FKZ:01LC1806A ), Germany; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ( NWO ); the National Science Foundation ( 1854767 ); a Cooperative Agreement with the US National Park Service ( P18AC00175 ); the University of Illinois Campus Research Board ( RB19119 ); and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación , Spain. E.O.-R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities ( IJCI-2017-34334 ). I.R.-M. gratefully acknowledges support from grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN /AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future.” J.J.K. received support from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMAS ( 2019-01648 ). C.M.R. also received support from the VIVA-PLAN project, funded by FORMAS (2018-00175).

Funding Information:
ENVISION was funded through the 2017?2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the support of the following national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS, 2018-02429); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (FKZ:01LC1806A), Germany; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO); the National Science Foundation (1854767); a Cooperative Agreement with the US National Park Service (P18AC00175); the University of Illinois Campus Research Board (RB19119); and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n, Spain. E.O.-R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities (IJCI-2017-34334). I.R.-M. gratefully acknowledges support from grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ?ESF Investing in your future.? J.J.K. received support from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMAS (2019-01648). C.M.R. also received support from the VIVA-PLAN project, funded by FORMAS (2018-00175). The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)

Funding

ENVISION was funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the support of the following national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development ( FORMAS, 2018-02429 ); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research ( BMBF ) ( FKZ:01LC1806A ), Germany; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ( NWO ); the National Science Foundation ( 1854767 ); a Cooperative Agreement with the US National Park Service ( P18AC00175 ); the University of Illinois Campus Research Board ( RB19119 ); and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación , Spain. E.O.-R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities ( IJCI-2017-34334 ). I.R.-M. gratefully acknowledges support from grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN /AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future.” J.J.K. received support from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMAS ( 2019-01648 ). C.M.R. also received support from the VIVA-PLAN project, funded by FORMAS (2018-00175).

Funders	Funder number
Swedish research council for sustainable development
National Science Foundation	1854767
National Science Foundation
National Park Service	P18AC00175
National Park Service
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades	IJCI-2017-34334
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Campus Research Board	RB19119
Campus Research Board
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas	2018-02429
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung	LC1806A
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

biodiversity conservation
ecosystem services
equity
inclusive conservation
plural valuation
protected area management
values

Access to Document

10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

Raymond, C. M., Cebrián-Piqueras, M. A., Andersson, E., Andrade, R., Schnell, A. A., Battioni Romanelli, B., Filyushkina, A., Goodson, D. J., Horcea-Milcu, A., Johnson, D. N., Keller, R., Kuiper, J. J., Lo, V., López-Rodríguez, M. D., March, H., Metzger, M., Oteros-Rozas, E., Salcido, E., Sellberg, M., ... Wiedermann, M. M. (2022). Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects. One Earth, 5(3), 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008

@article{e9f948390c9947d0b337b636c171e9e5,

title = "Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects",

abstract = "The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.",

keywords = "biodiversity conservation, ecosystem services, equity, inclusive conservation, plural valuation, protected area management, values",

author = "Raymond, \{Christopher M.\} and Cebri{\'a}n-Piqueras, \{Miguel A.\} and Erik Andersson and Riley Andrade and Schnell, \{Alberto Arroyo\} and \{Battioni Romanelli\}, Barbara and Anna Filyushkina and Goodson, \{Devin J.\} and Andra Horcea-Milcu and Johnson, \{Dana N.\} and Rose Keller and Kuiper, \{Jan J.\} and Veronica Lo and L{\'o}pez-Rodr{\'i}guez, \{Mar{\'i}a D.\} and Hug March and Marc Metzger and Elisa Oteros-Rozas and Evan Salcido and My Sellberg and William Stewart and Isabel Ruiz-Mall{\'e}n and Tobias Plieninger and \{van Riper\}, \{Carena J.\} and Verburg, \{Peter H.\} and Wiedermann, \{Magdalena M.\}",

note = "Funding Information: ENVISION was funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the support of the following national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development ( FORMAS, 2018-02429 ); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research ( BMBF ) ( FKZ:01LC1806A ), Germany; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ( NWO ); the National Science Foundation ( 1854767 ); a Cooperative Agreement with the US National Park Service ( P18AC00175 ); the University of Illinois Campus Research Board ( RB19119 ); and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci{\'o}n , Spain. E.O.-R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities ( IJCI-2017-34334 ). I.R.-M. gratefully acknowledges support from grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN /AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future.” J.J.K. received support from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMAS ( 2019-01648 ). C.M.R. also received support from the VIVA-PLAN project, funded by FORMAS (2018-00175). Funding Information: ENVISION was funded through the 2017?2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the support of the following national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS, 2018-02429); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (FKZ:01LC1806A), Germany; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO); the National Science Foundation (1854767); a Cooperative Agreement with the US National Park Service (P18AC00175); the University of Illinois Campus Research Board (RB19119); and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n, Spain. E.O.-R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities (IJCI-2017-34334). I.R.-M. gratefully acknowledges support from grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ?ESF Investing in your future.? J.J.K. received support from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMAS (2019-01648). C.M.R. also received support from the VIVA-PLAN project, funded by FORMAS (2018-00175). The authors declare no competing interests. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",

year = "2022",

month = mar,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "252--264",

journal = "One Earth",

issn = "2590-3330",

publisher = "Cell Press",

number = "3",

}

Raymond, CM, Cebrián-Piqueras, MA, Andersson, E, Andrade, R, Schnell, AA, Battioni Romanelli, B, Filyushkina, A, Goodson, DJ, Horcea-Milcu, A, Johnson, DN, Keller, R, Kuiper, JJ, Lo, V, López-Rodríguez, MD, March, H, Metzger, M, Oteros-Rozas, E, Salcido, E, Sellberg, M, Stewart, W, Ruiz-Mallén, I, Plieninger, T, van Riper, CJ, Verburg, PH & Wiedermann, MM 2022, 'Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects', One Earth, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects

AU - Raymond, Christopher M.

AU - Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel A.

AU - Andersson, Erik

AU - Andrade, Riley

AU - Schnell, Alberto Arroyo

AU - Battioni Romanelli, Barbara

AU - Filyushkina, Anna

AU - Goodson, Devin J.

AU - Horcea-Milcu, Andra

AU - Johnson, Dana N.

AU - Keller, Rose

AU - Kuiper, Jan J.

AU - Lo, Veronica

AU - López-Rodríguez, María D.

AU - March, Hug

AU - Metzger, Marc

AU - Oteros-Rozas, Elisa

AU - Salcido, Evan

AU - Sellberg, My

AU - Stewart, William

AU - Ruiz-Mallén, Isabel

AU - Plieninger, Tobias

AU - van Riper, Carena J.

AU - Verburg, Peter H.

AU - Wiedermann, Magdalena M.

N1 - Funding Information: ENVISION was funded through the 2017–2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the support of the following national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development ( FORMAS, 2018-02429 ); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research ( BMBF ) ( FKZ:01LC1806A ), Germany; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ( NWO ); the National Science Foundation ( 1854767 ); a Cooperative Agreement with the US National Park Service ( P18AC00175 ); the University of Illinois Campus Research Board ( RB19119 ); and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación , Spain. E.O.-R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities ( IJCI-2017-34334 ). I.R.-M. gratefully acknowledges support from grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN /AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future.” J.J.K. received support from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMAS ( 2019-01648 ). C.M.R. also received support from the VIVA-PLAN project, funded by FORMAS (2018-00175). Funding Information: ENVISION was funded through the 2017?2018 Belmont Forum and BiodivERsA joint call for research proposals, under the BiodivScen ERA-Net COFUND program, and with the support of the following national funders: the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development (FORMAS, 2018-02429); the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (FKZ:01LC1806A), Germany; the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO); the National Science Foundation (1854767); a Cooperative Agreement with the US National Park Service (P18AC00175); the University of Illinois Campus Research Board (RB19119); and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n, Spain. E.O.-R. has been funded by Juan de la Cierva Incorporation Fellowship of the Ministry of Science Innovation and Universities (IJCI-2017-34334). I.R.-M. gratefully acknowledges support from grant RYC-2015-17676 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ?ESF Investing in your future.? J.J.K. received support from the Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development FORMAS (2019-01648). C.M.R. also received support from the VIVA-PLAN project, funded by FORMAS (2018-00175). The authors declare no competing interests. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2022/3/18

Y1 - 2022/3/18

N2 - The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.

AB - The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.

KW - biodiversity conservation

KW - ecosystem services

KW - equity

KW - inclusive conservation

KW - plural valuation

KW - protected area management

KW - values

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126608408

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126608408#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85126608408

SN - 2590-3330

VL - 5

SP - 252

EP - 264

JO - One Earth

JF - One Earth

IS - 3

ER -

Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this