Abstract
Background: The majority of university students with mental health problems are untreated. Only a small empirical literature exists on strategies to increase mental health service use. Aims: To investigate the effects and moderators of a brief acceptance-facilitating intervention on intention to use mental health services among university students. Method: Within the German site of the World Health Organization's World Mental Health International College Student (WMH-ICS) initiative, 1,374 university students were randomized to an intervention condition (IC; n = 664) or a control condition (CC; n = 710) that was implemented in the survey itself. Both conditions received the questions assessing mental disorders and suicidality that were included in other WMH-ICS surveys. The IC group then additionally received: Internet-based personalized feedback based on subject symptom severity in the domains of depression, anxiety, substance use, suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and nonsuicidal self-injury; psychoeducation tailored to the personal symptom profile; and information about available university and community mental health services. The primary outcome was reported intention to use psychological interventions in the next semester, which was the last question in the survey. A broad range of potential moderating factors was explored. Results: There was a significant main effect of the intervention with students randomized to IC, reporting significantly higher intentions to seek help in the next semester than students in the CC condition (d = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.23). Moderator analyses indicated that the intervention was more effective among students that fulfilled the criteria for lifetime (d = 0.34; 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.7) and 12-month panic-disorder (d = 0.32; 95% CI: −0.10 to 0.74) compared with those without lifetime (d = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.22) or 12-month panic disorder (d = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.22), students with lower (d = 0.37; 95% CI: −0.77 to 1.51) than higher (d = −0.01; 95% CI: −0.36 to 0.34) self-reported physical health, and students with nonheterosexual (d = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.67) compared with heterosexual (d = 0.06; 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.17) sexual orientation. The intervention had no effects among students who reported that they recognized that they had an emotional problem and “are already working actively to change it” (Stage 4 “stages of change”). Conclusions: A simple acceptance-facilitating intervention can increase intention to use mental health services, although effects, are on average, small. Future studies should investigate more personalized approaches with interventions tailored to barriers and clinical characteristics of students. In order to optimize intervention effects, the development and evaluation should be realized in designs that are powered to allow incremental value of different intervention components and tailoring strategies to be evaluated, such as in multiphase optimization designs.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e1754 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-12 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 20 Nov 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Special Issue: WHO World Mental Health International College Student (WMH‐ICS) initiativeFunding
Funding to support this initiative was received from the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R56MH109566 (R. P. A.), and the content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or NIMH; the Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (11N0514N/11N0516N/1114717N) (P. M.), the King Baudouin Foundation (2014‐J2140150‐102905; R. B.), and Eli Lilly (IIT‐H6U‐BX‐ I002; R. B., P. M.); BARMER, a health care insurance company, for project StudiCare (D. D. E.); ZonMw (Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development; grant number 636110005) and the PFGV (PFGV; Protestants Fonds voor de Geestelijke Volksgezondheid) in support of the student survey project (P. C.); South African Medical Research Council and the Ithemba Foundation (D. J. S.); Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III ‐ FEDER (PI13/00343), ISCIII (Río Hortega, CM14/00125), ISCIII (Sara Borrell, CD12/00440), Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, PNSD (Exp. 2015I015); DIUE Generalitat de Catalunya (2017 SGR 452), FPU (FPU15/05728; J. A.); Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III‐FEDER (PI13/00506; G. V.); European Union Regional Development Fund (ERDF) EU Sustainable Competitiveness Programme for Northern Ireland, Northern Ireland Public Health Agency (HSC R&D), and Ulster University (T. B.); Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) grant CB‐ 2016‐01‐285548 (C. B.). The WMH‐ICS initiative is carried out as part of the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative. The WMH survey is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R01MH070884, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Pfizer Foundation, the United States Public Health Service (R13‐MH066849, R01‐MH069864, and R01‐DA016558), the Fogarty International Center (FIRCA R03‐TW006481), the Pan American Health Organization, Eli Lilly and Company, Ortho‐McNeil Pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline, and Bristol‐Myers Squibb (RCK). None of the funders had any role in the design, analysis, interpretation of results, or preparation of this paper. Foundation, Grant/Award Number: 2014‐ J2140150‐102905; Eli Lilly, Grant/Award Number: IIT‐H6U‐BX‐I002; BARMER; Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), Grant/Award Number: 636110005; Protestants Fonds voor de Geestelijke Volksgezondheid (PFGV); South African Medical Research Council; Ithemba Foundation; Instituto de Salud Carlos III‐ FEDER, Grant/Award Numbers: 00506 and PI13; DIUE Generalitat de Catalunya; Northern Ireland Public Health Agency and Ulster University; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Grant/Award Number: CB‐2016‐01‐285548; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; Pfizer Foundation; United States Public Health Service, Grant/Award Numbers: R01‐DA016558, R01‐MH069864 and R13‐MH066849; Fogarty International Center (FIRCA), Grant/ Award Number: FIRCA R03‐TW006481; Pan American Health Organization; Ortho‐McNeil Pharmaceutical; GlaxoSmithKline; Bristol‐ Myers Squibb National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Grant/Award Numbers: R01MH070884 and R56MH109566; Belgian Fund for Scientific Research, Grant/Award Numbers: 1114717N, 11N0516N and 11N0514N; King Baudouin
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
BARMER | |
Bristol‐ Myers Squibb | |
EU Sustainable Competitiveness Programme for Northern Ireland | |
HSC R&D | |
Ithemba Foundation | |
Northern Ireland Public Health Agency | |
Río Hortega | CM14/00125 |
Sara Borrell | CD12/00440 |
Servicios Sociales e Igualdad | |
National Institute of Mental Health | R13MH066849, R56MH109566, R01MH070884 |
Fogarty International Center | FIRCA R03‐TW006481 |
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation | |
King Baudouin Foundation United States | |
Eli Lilly and Company | IIT‐H6U‐BX‐I002 |
GlaxoSmithKline | |
U.S. Public Health Service | R01‐DA016558, R01‐MH069864, R13‐MH066849 |
Pfizer Foundation | |
Pan American Health Organization | |
Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social | |
Plan Nacional sobre Drogas | 2015I015 |
South African Medical Research Council | |
Ulster University | |
ZonMw | 636110005 |
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS | 11N0516N, 11N0514N/11N0516N/1114717N, 1114717N, 11N0514N |
Generalitat de Catalunya | FPU15/05728, 2017 SGR 452 |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología | CB‐ 2016‐01‐285548 |
Instituto de Salud Carlos III | 00506, PI13/00343, PI13/00506, PI13 |
Koning Boudewijnstichting | 2014‐ J2140150‐102905 |
European Regional Development Fund | |
Nationaal Fonds Geestelijke Volksgezondheid |
Keywords
- health behavior
- psychoeducation
- public mental health
- risk factors