Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Indeterminacy in Affective Computing: Considering Meaning and Context in Data Collection Practices

  • Bernd Dudzik*
  • , Tiffany Matej Hrkalovic*
  • , Chenxu Hao*
  • , Chirag Raman*
  • , Masha Tsfasman*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Automatic Affect Prediction (AAP) uses computational analysis of input data such as text, speech, images, and physiological signals to predict various affective phenomena (e.g., emotions or moods). These models are typically constructed using supervised machine-learning algorithms, which rely heavily on labeled training datasets. In this position paper, we posit that all AAP training data are derived from human Affective Interpretation Processes (AIPs resulting in a form of Affective Meaning. Research on human affect indicates a form of complexity that is fundamental to such meaning: it can possess what we refer to here broadly as Qualities of Indeterminacy (QIs)-encompassing Subjectivity (meaning depends on who is making the interpretation), Uncertainty (there is a lack of confidence regarding its correctness), Ambiguity (meaning can contain mutually exclusive concepts) and Vagueness (meaning can be situated at different levels in a nested hierarchy). Failing to appropriately consider QIs in AAP leads to results incapable of meaningful and reliable predictions in real-world settings. Based on this premise, our core argument is that a crucial step in adequately addressing indeterminacy in AAP is the development of data collection practices for modeling corpora that involve the systematic consideration of 1) a relevant set of QIs, and 2) context for the associated interpretation processes. To this end, we are 1) outlining a conceptual model of AIPs and the QIs associated with the meaning these produce, in addition to a conceptual structure of relevant context, supporting understanding of its role. Finally, we use our framework for 2) discussing examples of context-sensitivity-related challenges for addressing QIs in data collection setups. We believe our efforts can stimulate a structured discussion of both the role of aspects of indeterminacy and context in research on AAP, informing the development of better practices for data collection and analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2024 12th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW)
Subtitle of host publication[Proceedings]
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages181-185
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9798331516451
ISBN (Print)9798331516468
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Event12th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos, ACIIW 2024 - Glasgow, United Kingdom
Duration: 15 Sept 2024 → …

Conference

Conference12th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos, ACIIW 2024
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityGlasgow
Period15/09/24 → …

Bibliographical note

Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 24 April 2025.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.

Keywords

  • Affective Computing
  • Ambiguity
  • Context-awareness
  • Date Collection
  • Subjectivity
  • User-modeling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indeterminacy in Affective Computing: Considering Meaning and Context in Data Collection Practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this