Indications and extent of elective neck dissection in patients with early stage oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: nationwide survey in The Netherlands

R. de Bree, I. van der Waal, P. Doornaert, J.A. Werner, J.A. Castelijns, C.R. Leemans

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Different strategies are available for the management of patients with early (i.e. tumour stage one or two) oral or oropharyngeal carcinoma and a clinically negative neck.

    Material and methods: In 2006, a questionnaire was sent to the eight head and neck cancer centres of the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology Cooperative Group. This questionnaire covered: the factors influencing the decision to perform an elective neck dissection; the neck staging procedure; and the types of neck dissection undertaken.

    Results: All eight questionnaires were returned completed. Respondents indicated that the site (n = 6), size (n = 7) and thickness (n = 6) of the primary tumour were important in decisions regarding elective neck dissection. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology was the most frequently used diagnostic technique (n = 7). Depending on the site and stage of the primary tumour presented, in the different cases 3-7 of the centres would perform an elective neck dissection. Selective neck dissections (i.e. levels I to III/IV) were more frequently performed than modified radical neck dissections.

    Conclusion: There was no uniformity regarding management of the clinically negative neck in patients with early stage oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma, within The Netherlands.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)889-898
    JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
    Volume123
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Indications and extent of elective neck dissection in patients with early stage oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: nationwide survey in The Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this