Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Inequality Regimes in Coworking Spaces: How New Forms of Organising (Re)produce Inequalities

  • Lena Knappert*
  • , Boukje Cnossen
  • , Renate Ortlieb
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Coworking is a rapidly growing worldwide phenomenon. While the coworking movement emphasises equality and emancipation, there is little known about the extent to which coworking spaces as new forms of organising live up to this ideal. This study examines inequality in coworking spaces in the Netherlands, employing Acker’s framework of inequality regimes. The findings highlight coworking-specific components of inequality regimes, in particular stereotyped assumptions regarding ‘ideal members’ that establish the bases of inequality, practices that produce inequality (e.g. through the commodification of community) and practices that perpetuate inequality (e.g. the denial of inequality). The study provides an update of Acker’s framework in the context of coworking and speaks, more broadly, to the growing body of literature on (in)equality in emerging organisational contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-63
Number of pages21
JournalWork, Employment and Society
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was partly supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) [grant number 407-12-008].

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek407-12-008

    Keywords

    • coworking spaces
    • inequality regimes
    • new forms of organising

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inequality Regimes in Coworking Spaces: How New Forms of Organising (Re)produce Inequalities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this