TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of biomechanical models on joint kinematics and kinetics in baseball pitching
AU - Gasparutto, Xavier
AU - van der Graaff, Erik
AU - van der Helm, Frans C.T.
AU - Veeger, Dirkjan H.E.J.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In baseball pitching, biomechanical parameters have been linked to ball velocity and potential injury risk. However, although the features of a biomechanical model have a significant influence on the kinematics and kinetics of a motion, this influence have not been assessed for pitching. The aim of this study was to evaluate the choice of the trunk and shoulder features, by comparing two models using the same input. The models differed in thoraco-humeral joint definition (moving or fixed with the thorax), joint centre estimation, values of the inertial parameters and computational framework. One professional pitcher participated in the study. We found that the different features of the biomechanical models have a substantial influence on the kinematics and kinetics of the pitchers. With a fixed thoraco-humeral joint the peak average thorax angular velocity was delayed and underestimated by 17% and the shoulder internal rotation velocity was overestimated by 7%. The use of a thoraco-humeral joint fixed to the thorax will lead to an overestimation of the rotational power at the shoulder and will neglect the power produced by the forward and upward translation of the shoulder girdle. These findings have direct implications for the interpretation of shoulder muscle contributions to the pitch.
AB - In baseball pitching, biomechanical parameters have been linked to ball velocity and potential injury risk. However, although the features of a biomechanical model have a significant influence on the kinematics and kinetics of a motion, this influence have not been assessed for pitching. The aim of this study was to evaluate the choice of the trunk and shoulder features, by comparing two models using the same input. The models differed in thoraco-humeral joint definition (moving or fixed with the thorax), joint centre estimation, values of the inertial parameters and computational framework. One professional pitcher participated in the study. We found that the different features of the biomechanical models have a substantial influence on the kinematics and kinetics of the pitchers. With a fixed thoraco-humeral joint the peak average thorax angular velocity was delayed and underestimated by 17% and the shoulder internal rotation velocity was overestimated by 7%. The use of a thoraco-humeral joint fixed to the thorax will lead to an overestimation of the rotational power at the shoulder and will neglect the power produced by the forward and upward translation of the shoulder girdle. These findings have direct implications for the interpretation of shoulder muscle contributions to the pitch.
KW - Inverse dynamics
KW - modelling
KW - overhand throw
KW - shoulder
KW - trunk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057603664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057603664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14763141.2018.1523453
DO - 10.1080/14763141.2018.1523453
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057603664
VL - 20
SP - 96
EP - 108
JO - Sports Biomechanics
JF - Sports Biomechanics
SN - 1476-3141
IS - 1
ER -