Influence of biomechanical models on joint kinematics and kinetics in baseball pitching

Xavier Gasparutto, Erik van der Graaff, Frans C.T. van der Helm, Dirkjan H.E.J. Veeger

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In baseball pitching, biomechanical parameters have been linked to ball velocity and potential injury risk. However, although the features of a biomechanical model have a significant influence on the kinematics and kinetics of a motion, this influence have not been assessed for pitching. The aim of this study was to evaluate the choice of the trunk and shoulder features, by comparing two models using the same input. The models differed in thoraco-humeral joint definition (moving or fixed with the thorax), joint centre estimation, values of the inertial parameters and computational framework. One professional pitcher participated in the study. We found that the different features of the biomechanical models have a substantial influence on the kinematics and kinetics of the pitchers. With a fixed thoraco-humeral joint the peak average thorax angular velocity was delayed and underestimated by 17% and the shoulder internal rotation velocity was overestimated by 7%. The use of a thoraco-humeral joint fixed to the thorax will lead to an overestimation of the rotational power at the shoulder and will neglect the power produced by the forward and upward translation of the shoulder girdle. These findings have direct implications for the interpretation of shoulder muscle contributions to the pitch.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalSports Biomechanics
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Baseball
Biomechanical Phenomena
Joints
Thorax
Muscles
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Inverse dynamics
  • modelling
  • overhand throw
  • shoulder
  • trunk

Cite this

Gasparutto, Xavier ; van der Graaff, Erik ; van der Helm, Frans C.T. ; Veeger, Dirkjan H.E.J. / Influence of biomechanical models on joint kinematics and kinetics in baseball pitching. In: Sports Biomechanics. 2018 ; pp. 1-13.
@article{0d734d819d004ac0ab967904a1e84659,
title = "Influence of biomechanical models on joint kinematics and kinetics in baseball pitching",
abstract = "In baseball pitching, biomechanical parameters have been linked to ball velocity and potential injury risk. However, although the features of a biomechanical model have a significant influence on the kinematics and kinetics of a motion, this influence have not been assessed for pitching. The aim of this study was to evaluate the choice of the trunk and shoulder features, by comparing two models using the same input. The models differed in thoraco-humeral joint definition (moving or fixed with the thorax), joint centre estimation, values of the inertial parameters and computational framework. One professional pitcher participated in the study. We found that the different features of the biomechanical models have a substantial influence on the kinematics and kinetics of the pitchers. With a fixed thoraco-humeral joint the peak average thorax angular velocity was delayed and underestimated by 17{\%} and the shoulder internal rotation velocity was overestimated by 7{\%}. The use of a thoraco-humeral joint fixed to the thorax will lead to an overestimation of the rotational power at the shoulder and will neglect the power produced by the forward and upward translation of the shoulder girdle. These findings have direct implications for the interpretation of shoulder muscle contributions to the pitch.",
keywords = "Inverse dynamics, modelling, overhand throw, shoulder, trunk",
author = "Xavier Gasparutto and {van der Graaff}, Erik and {van der Helm}, {Frans C.T.} and Veeger, {Dirkjan H.E.J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/14763141.2018.1523453",
language = "English",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Sports Biomechanics",
issn = "1476-3141",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Influence of biomechanical models on joint kinematics and kinetics in baseball pitching. / Gasparutto, Xavier; van der Graaff, Erik; van der Helm, Frans C.T.; Veeger, Dirkjan H.E.J.

In: Sports Biomechanics, 28.11.2018, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of biomechanical models on joint kinematics and kinetics in baseball pitching

AU - Gasparutto, Xavier

AU - van der Graaff, Erik

AU - van der Helm, Frans C.T.

AU - Veeger, Dirkjan H.E.J.

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - In baseball pitching, biomechanical parameters have been linked to ball velocity and potential injury risk. However, although the features of a biomechanical model have a significant influence on the kinematics and kinetics of a motion, this influence have not been assessed for pitching. The aim of this study was to evaluate the choice of the trunk and shoulder features, by comparing two models using the same input. The models differed in thoraco-humeral joint definition (moving or fixed with the thorax), joint centre estimation, values of the inertial parameters and computational framework. One professional pitcher participated in the study. We found that the different features of the biomechanical models have a substantial influence on the kinematics and kinetics of the pitchers. With a fixed thoraco-humeral joint the peak average thorax angular velocity was delayed and underestimated by 17% and the shoulder internal rotation velocity was overestimated by 7%. The use of a thoraco-humeral joint fixed to the thorax will lead to an overestimation of the rotational power at the shoulder and will neglect the power produced by the forward and upward translation of the shoulder girdle. These findings have direct implications for the interpretation of shoulder muscle contributions to the pitch.

AB - In baseball pitching, biomechanical parameters have been linked to ball velocity and potential injury risk. However, although the features of a biomechanical model have a significant influence on the kinematics and kinetics of a motion, this influence have not been assessed for pitching. The aim of this study was to evaluate the choice of the trunk and shoulder features, by comparing two models using the same input. The models differed in thoraco-humeral joint definition (moving or fixed with the thorax), joint centre estimation, values of the inertial parameters and computational framework. One professional pitcher participated in the study. We found that the different features of the biomechanical models have a substantial influence on the kinematics and kinetics of the pitchers. With a fixed thoraco-humeral joint the peak average thorax angular velocity was delayed and underestimated by 17% and the shoulder internal rotation velocity was overestimated by 7%. The use of a thoraco-humeral joint fixed to the thorax will lead to an overestimation of the rotational power at the shoulder and will neglect the power produced by the forward and upward translation of the shoulder girdle. These findings have direct implications for the interpretation of shoulder muscle contributions to the pitch.

KW - Inverse dynamics

KW - modelling

KW - overhand throw

KW - shoulder

KW - trunk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057603664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057603664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14763141.2018.1523453

DO - 10.1080/14763141.2018.1523453

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Sports Biomechanics

JF - Sports Biomechanics

SN - 1476-3141

ER -