Influence of dentin and enamel on the fracture resistance of restorations at several thicknesses

P. De Kok, C.J. Kleverlaan, R.H. Kuijs, M.A. Öztoprak, A.J. Feilzer

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of substrate and thickness on the fracture resistance of bonded dental restorative materials. Methods: Cylindrical restorations (d = 4.0 mm) of resin composites Filtek Supreme XTE, Clearfil AP-X, Lava Ultimate and glass-ceramic IPS e.max CAD were fabricated at thicknesses of 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm and 2.0 mm respectively (n = 10 per group) and adhesively bonded to bovine enamel or dentin. The load to failure (LtF in N) of all specimens was determined in a universal testing machine and two one-way ANOVAs with a post hoc LSD tests and separate independent samples t-tests, performed at a significance level of 5%. Results: At 0.5 and 1.0 mm, direct resin composites bonded to dentin showed a higher LtF than when bonded to enamel, while the indirect materials showed reversed results (P< 0.05). At 2.0 mm there was no difference except for LU. A direct relationship between LtF and increasing thicknesses on enamel was found, while on dentin the LtF of direct resin composite restorations was less dependent on the thickness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-38
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume31
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of dentin and enamel on the fracture resistance of restorations at several thicknesses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this