TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of different restorative materials on the stress distribution in dental implants
AU - Datte, Carlos Eduardo
AU - Tribst, João Paulo Mendes
AU - Dal Piva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira
AU - Nishioka, Renato Sussumu
AU - Bottino, Marco Antonio
AU - Evangelhista, Alexandre Duarte M.
AU - Monteiro, Fabrício M.de M.
AU - Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Medicina Oral S.L.C.I.F.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Background: To assist clinicians in deciding the most suitable restorative materials to be used in the crowns and abutment in implant rehabilitation. Material and Methods: For finite element analysis (FEA), a regular morse taper implant was created using a computer aided design software. The implant was inserted at the bone model with 3 mm of exposed threads. An anatomic prosthesis representing a first maxillary molar was modeled and cemented on the solid abutment. Considering the crown material (zirconia, chromium-cobalt, lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic) and abutment (Titanium and zirconia), the geometries were multiplied, totaling eight groups. In order to perform the static analysis, the contacts were considered bonded and each material was assigned as isotropic. An axial load (200 N) was applied on the crown and fixation occurred on the base of the bone. Results using Von-Mises criteria and micro strain values were obtained. A sample identical to the CAD model was made for the Strain Gauge (SG) analysis; four SGs were bonded around the implant to obtain micro strain results in bone tissue. Results: FEA results were 3.83% lower than SG. According to the crown material, it is possible to note that the increase of elastic modulus reduces the stress concentration in all system without difference for bone. Conclusions: Crown materials with high elastic modulus are able to decrease the stress values in the abutments while concentrates the stress in its structure. Zirconia abutments tend to concentrate more stress throughout the prosthetic system and may be more susceptible to mechanical problems than titanium.
AB - Background: To assist clinicians in deciding the most suitable restorative materials to be used in the crowns and abutment in implant rehabilitation. Material and Methods: For finite element analysis (FEA), a regular morse taper implant was created using a computer aided design software. The implant was inserted at the bone model with 3 mm of exposed threads. An anatomic prosthesis representing a first maxillary molar was modeled and cemented on the solid abutment. Considering the crown material (zirconia, chromium-cobalt, lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic) and abutment (Titanium and zirconia), the geometries were multiplied, totaling eight groups. In order to perform the static analysis, the contacts were considered bonded and each material was assigned as isotropic. An axial load (200 N) was applied on the crown and fixation occurred on the base of the bone. Results using Von-Mises criteria and micro strain values were obtained. A sample identical to the CAD model was made for the Strain Gauge (SG) analysis; four SGs were bonded around the implant to obtain micro strain results in bone tissue. Results: FEA results were 3.83% lower than SG. According to the crown material, it is possible to note that the increase of elastic modulus reduces the stress concentration in all system without difference for bone. Conclusions: Crown materials with high elastic modulus are able to decrease the stress values in the abutments while concentrates the stress in its structure. Zirconia abutments tend to concentrate more stress throughout the prosthetic system and may be more susceptible to mechanical problems than titanium.
KW - ceramic
KW - dental implants
KW - Finite element analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046431990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046431990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4317/jced.54554
DO - 10.4317/jced.54554
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046431990
SN - 1989-5488
VL - 10
SP - e439-e444
JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
IS - 5
ER -