Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Y. Wang; F. Fan; X. Li; Q. Zhou; B. He; X. Huang; S. Huang; J. Ma

doi:10.3290/j.qi.a41976

Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Y. Wang, F. Fan, X. Li, Q. Zhou, B. He, X. Huang, S. Huang, J. Ma

Oral Implantology

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal tissue health is controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal health by a systematic review and meta-analysis and to provide scientific guidelines for gingival retraction method selection in clinical work. Data Sources: The databases were systematically queried to collect studies exploring the effect of gingival retraction methods on periodontal tissue health in randomized controlled trials. Literature covering the period of January 1998 to April 2017 was extracted and the quality was assessed, followed by a random-effects meta-analysis with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The result of meta-analysis revealed that gingival retraction paste exhibited a less deleterious effect on the periodontal tissue compared with the gingival retraction cord technique measured by probing depth, Gingival Bleeding Index, and bleeding on probing (P < .05). However, no statistically significant differences were found in the measurements of Plaque Index, Gingival Index, and gingival recession between these two methods (P > .05). Conclusions: Gingival retraction paste can work better than the gingival retraction cord method in protecting periodontal tissue health.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	234-244
Journal	Quintessence International
Volume	50
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a41976
Publication status	Published - Mar 2019

Bibliographical note

Cited By :2

Export Date: 22 October 2019

Funding

Bing He Postdoctoral Fellow, Protein Section, Laboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA The authors thank Professor Hai Zhang for proofreading the article. This work was supported by the following grants: Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81500817, 81870777, 81802230), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LY15H140008), Health Science and Technology Project of Zheji-ang Province (No. 2016KYB184), Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Project for Public Welfare (No.2017C33081), Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project for Public Welfare (Nos. Y20150069, Y20170026), Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Nos. Y20160051, Y20140704), and the Zhejiang Provincial College Students’Science and Technology Innovation Project and Fresh Talent Program (Nos. 2017R413067, 2017R413082).

Funders	Funder number
National Institutes of Health
National Cancer Institute
National Natural Science Foundation of China	81802230, 81500817, 81870777
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province	LY15H140008
Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau
Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project	2017C33081
Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province	2016KYB184

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.3290/j.qi.a41976

Persistent URL (handle)

Copy link address

Cite this

@article{79cc44d32d92439d97d7ddf98ba5247e,

title = "Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: A systematic review and meta-analysis",

abstract = "Objectives: The effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal tissue health is controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal health by a systematic review and meta-analysis and to provide scientific guidelines for gingival retraction method selection in clinical work. Data Sources: The databases were systematically queried to collect studies exploring the effect of gingival retraction methods on periodontal tissue health in randomized controlled trials. Literature covering the period of January 1998 to April 2017 was extracted and the quality was assessed, followed by a random-effects meta-analysis with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The result of meta-analysis revealed that gingival retraction paste exhibited a less deleterious effect on the periodontal tissue compared with the gingival retraction cord technique measured by probing depth, Gingival Bleeding Index, and bleeding on probing (P < .05). However, no statistically significant differences were found in the measurements of Plaque Index, Gingival Index, and gingival recession between these two methods (P > .05). Conclusions: Gingival retraction paste can work better than the gingival retraction cord method in protecting periodontal tissue health.",

author = "Y. Wang and F. Fan and X. Li and Q. Zhou and B. He and X. Huang and S. Huang and J. Ma",

note = "Cited By :2 Export Date: 22 October 2019",

year = "2019",

month = mar,

doi = "10.3290/j.qi.a41976",

language = "English",

volume = "50",

pages = "234--244",

journal = "Quintessence International",

issn = "0033-6572",

publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Wang, Y.

AU - Fan, F.

AU - Li, X.

AU - Zhou, Q.

AU - He, B.

AU - Huang, X.

AU - Huang, S.

AU - Ma, J.

N1 - Cited By :2 Export Date: 22 October 2019

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Objectives: The effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal tissue health is controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal health by a systematic review and meta-analysis and to provide scientific guidelines for gingival retraction method selection in clinical work. Data Sources: The databases were systematically queried to collect studies exploring the effect of gingival retraction methods on periodontal tissue health in randomized controlled trials. Literature covering the period of January 1998 to April 2017 was extracted and the quality was assessed, followed by a random-effects meta-analysis with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The result of meta-analysis revealed that gingival retraction paste exhibited a less deleterious effect on the periodontal tissue compared with the gingival retraction cord technique measured by probing depth, Gingival Bleeding Index, and bleeding on probing (P < .05). However, no statistically significant differences were found in the measurements of Plaque Index, Gingival Index, and gingival recession between these two methods (P > .05). Conclusions: Gingival retraction paste can work better than the gingival retraction cord method in protecting periodontal tissue health.

AB - Objectives: The effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal tissue health is controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of gingival retraction paste versus gingival retraction cord on periodontal health by a systematic review and meta-analysis and to provide scientific guidelines for gingival retraction method selection in clinical work. Data Sources: The databases were systematically queried to collect studies exploring the effect of gingival retraction methods on periodontal tissue health in randomized controlled trials. Literature covering the period of January 1998 to April 2017 was extracted and the quality was assessed, followed by a random-effects meta-analysis with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The result of meta-analysis revealed that gingival retraction paste exhibited a less deleterious effect on the periodontal tissue compared with the gingival retraction cord technique measured by probing depth, Gingival Bleeding Index, and bleeding on probing (P < .05). However, no statistically significant differences were found in the measurements of Plaque Index, Gingival Index, and gingival recession between these two methods (P > .05). Conclusions: Gingival retraction paste can work better than the gingival retraction cord method in protecting periodontal tissue health.

U2 - 10.3290/j.qi.a41976

DO - 10.3290/j.qi.a41976

M3 - Article

SN - 0033-6572

VL - 50

SP - 234

EP - 244

JO - Quintessence International

JF - Quintessence International

IS - 3

ER -

Influence of gingival retraction paste versus cord on periodontal health: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Fingerprint

Cite this