Innovation protection in the Dutch printing industry

M.C. Mol, E. Masurel

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although the scholarly attention for innovation by SMEs is beyond discussion, much of the protective behaviour of SMEs concerning their innovations is unknown. A survey was sent to 1,337 SMEs from the Dutch Printing Industry, containing questions on: the firm; the entrepreneur; and a recent product or process innovation. The degree of formality of the protection of product innovations turns out to be influenced by: innovativeness; public financial support; cooperation; the educational level of the entrepreneur; the experience of the entrepreneur; and, surprisingly, by lower innovation investments, and rural locations. The degree of formality of the protection of process innovations is influenced by: public financial support; the newness of the innovation; the innovativeness of the innovation; and, again contrary to what we expected, lower innovation investments and the rural location of the firm. The lifespan of the innovation and firm size turned out not to play any role at all. © 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-99
JournalInternational Journal of Intellectual Property Management
Volume7
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

printing trade
innovation
entrepreneur
firm
Printing industry
Innovation
life-span
role play

Cite this

@article{991b98e006d64657a65109099fe9eeaf,
title = "Innovation protection in the Dutch printing industry",
abstract = "Although the scholarly attention for innovation by SMEs is beyond discussion, much of the protective behaviour of SMEs concerning their innovations is unknown. A survey was sent to 1,337 SMEs from the Dutch Printing Industry, containing questions on: the firm; the entrepreneur; and a recent product or process innovation. The degree of formality of the protection of product innovations turns out to be influenced by: innovativeness; public financial support; cooperation; the educational level of the entrepreneur; the experience of the entrepreneur; and, surprisingly, by lower innovation investments, and rural locations. The degree of formality of the protection of process innovations is influenced by: public financial support; the newness of the innovation; the innovativeness of the innovation; and, again contrary to what we expected, lower innovation investments and the rural location of the firm. The lifespan of the innovation and firm size turned out not to play any role at all. {\circledC} 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
author = "M.C. Mol and E. Masurel",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1504/IJIPM.2014.062796",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "84--99",
journal = "International Journal of Intellectual Property Management",
issn = "1478-9647",
publisher = "Inderscience Publishers",
number = "1-2",

}

Innovation protection in the Dutch printing industry. / Mol, M.C.; Masurel, E.

In: International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, Vol. 7, No. 1-2, 2014, p. 84-99.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovation protection in the Dutch printing industry

AU - Mol, M.C.

AU - Masurel, E.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although the scholarly attention for innovation by SMEs is beyond discussion, much of the protective behaviour of SMEs concerning their innovations is unknown. A survey was sent to 1,337 SMEs from the Dutch Printing Industry, containing questions on: the firm; the entrepreneur; and a recent product or process innovation. The degree of formality of the protection of product innovations turns out to be influenced by: innovativeness; public financial support; cooperation; the educational level of the entrepreneur; the experience of the entrepreneur; and, surprisingly, by lower innovation investments, and rural locations. The degree of formality of the protection of process innovations is influenced by: public financial support; the newness of the innovation; the innovativeness of the innovation; and, again contrary to what we expected, lower innovation investments and the rural location of the firm. The lifespan of the innovation and firm size turned out not to play any role at all. © 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

AB - Although the scholarly attention for innovation by SMEs is beyond discussion, much of the protective behaviour of SMEs concerning their innovations is unknown. A survey was sent to 1,337 SMEs from the Dutch Printing Industry, containing questions on: the firm; the entrepreneur; and a recent product or process innovation. The degree of formality of the protection of product innovations turns out to be influenced by: innovativeness; public financial support; cooperation; the educational level of the entrepreneur; the experience of the entrepreneur; and, surprisingly, by lower innovation investments, and rural locations. The degree of formality of the protection of process innovations is influenced by: public financial support; the newness of the innovation; the innovativeness of the innovation; and, again contrary to what we expected, lower innovation investments and the rural location of the firm. The lifespan of the innovation and firm size turned out not to play any role at all. © 2014 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

U2 - 10.1504/IJIPM.2014.062796

DO - 10.1504/IJIPM.2014.062796

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 84

EP - 99

JO - International Journal of Intellectual Property Management

JF - International Journal of Intellectual Property Management

SN - 1478-9647

IS - 1-2

ER -