Innovation vs. Imitation and the Evolution of Productivity Distributions

M.D. Konig, Fabrizio Zilibotti, Jan Lorenz

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We develop a tractable dynamic model of productivity growth and technology spillovers that is consistent with the emergence of real world empirical productivity distributions. Firms can improve productivity by engaging in in-house R&D, or alternatively, by trying to imitate other firms' technologies, subject to the limits of their absorptive capacities. The outcome of both strategies is stochastic. The choice between in-house R&D and imitation is endogenous, and based on firms' profit maximization motive. Firms closer to the technological frontier face fewer imitation opportunities, and choose in-house R&D, while firms farther from the frontier try to imitate more productive technologies. The equilibrium choice leads to a balanced-growth equilibrium featuring persistent productivity differences even when starting from ex-ante identical firms. The long-run productivity distribution can be described as a traveling wave with tails following a Pareto as can be observed in the empirical data.
Original languageEnglish
Article number11
Pages (from-to)1053-1102
JournalTheoretical Economics
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Innovation
Productivity
Imitation
Empirical data
Productivity growth
Technology spillovers
Pareto
Traveling wave
Balanced growth
Profit maximization
Absorptive capacity

Cite this

@article{aae0eeae1c4e4d579de9e5c4493ae4c3,
title = "Innovation vs. Imitation and the Evolution of Productivity Distributions",
abstract = "We develop a tractable dynamic model of productivity growth and technology spillovers that is consistent with the emergence of real world empirical productivity distributions. Firms can improve productivity by engaging in in-house R&D, or alternatively, by trying to imitate other firms' technologies, subject to the limits of their absorptive capacities. The outcome of both strategies is stochastic. The choice between in-house R&D and imitation is endogenous, and based on firms' profit maximization motive. Firms closer to the technological frontier face fewer imitation opportunities, and choose in-house R&D, while firms farther from the frontier try to imitate more productive technologies. The equilibrium choice leads to a balanced-growth equilibrium featuring persistent productivity differences even when starting from ex-ante identical firms. The long-run productivity distribution can be described as a traveling wave with tails following a Pareto as can be observed in the empirical data.",
author = "M.D. Konig and Fabrizio Zilibotti and Jan Lorenz",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
pages = "1053--1102",
journal = "Theoretical Economics",

}

Innovation vs. Imitation and the Evolution of Productivity Distributions. / Konig, M.D.; Zilibotti, Fabrizio; Lorenz, Jan.

In: Theoretical Economics, 2016, p. 1053-1102.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovation vs. Imitation and the Evolution of Productivity Distributions

AU - Konig, M.D.

AU - Zilibotti, Fabrizio

AU - Lorenz, Jan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We develop a tractable dynamic model of productivity growth and technology spillovers that is consistent with the emergence of real world empirical productivity distributions. Firms can improve productivity by engaging in in-house R&D, or alternatively, by trying to imitate other firms' technologies, subject to the limits of their absorptive capacities. The outcome of both strategies is stochastic. The choice between in-house R&D and imitation is endogenous, and based on firms' profit maximization motive. Firms closer to the technological frontier face fewer imitation opportunities, and choose in-house R&D, while firms farther from the frontier try to imitate more productive technologies. The equilibrium choice leads to a balanced-growth equilibrium featuring persistent productivity differences even when starting from ex-ante identical firms. The long-run productivity distribution can be described as a traveling wave with tails following a Pareto as can be observed in the empirical data.

AB - We develop a tractable dynamic model of productivity growth and technology spillovers that is consistent with the emergence of real world empirical productivity distributions. Firms can improve productivity by engaging in in-house R&D, or alternatively, by trying to imitate other firms' technologies, subject to the limits of their absorptive capacities. The outcome of both strategies is stochastic. The choice between in-house R&D and imitation is endogenous, and based on firms' profit maximization motive. Firms closer to the technological frontier face fewer imitation opportunities, and choose in-house R&D, while firms farther from the frontier try to imitate more productive technologies. The equilibrium choice leads to a balanced-growth equilibrium featuring persistent productivity differences even when starting from ex-ante identical firms. The long-run productivity distribution can be described as a traveling wave with tails following a Pareto as can be observed in the empirical data.

M3 - Article

SP - 1053

EP - 1102

JO - Theoretical Economics

JF - Theoretical Economics

M1 - 11

ER -