Innovations in the veterinary intestinal health field: A patent landscape analysis

Marga E.M. Janse*, Dick B. Zinkweg, Olaf F.A. Larsen, Linda van de Burgwal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In recent years it has become evident that a healthy intestinal microbiome is beneficial for the overall health of an individual. A healthy microbiome is diverse, increasing stability and resilience and strengthening the immune system. In addition, healthy intestinal metabolisms have a beneficial effect on many physiological processes such as the brain function. Looking from the One Health perspective, which recognizes that health of humans is closely connected to the health of animals and environment, it is inherently beneficial to stimulate the health of animals for the well-being of humans. However, the intensive administration of antibiotics to livestock for prevention and cure of disease, and even stimulation of growth, disrupts a healthy microbiome. With the rapid increase of emerging zoonotic diseases, alternatives to the use of antimicrobial compounds are urgently necessary. This research analyses the development of alternatives for antibiotic use contributing to veterinary intestinal health through an in-depth patent analysis of inventions for fodder additives. In the period 1999–2020, 1269 unique patent families describing the use of probiotics, enzymes and prebiotics for swine, poultry and ruminants were identified. Innovation trends, geography, key applicants, and classification of patents were analysed. Asian industrial applicants applied for the majority of patents comprising the largest share of patents for probiotics and enzymes in combination with fodder for swine. Followed by North American and European industrial applications, applying for patents for probiotics in combination with fodder for poultry, swine, and ruminants. Overall, our results do not show a clear increase in innovations, suggesting that innovations in the use of probiotics and enzymes in animal feed appear to be stalling. While in the near future a combination of the use of antibiotics and alternatives is most likely to be implemented, the use of probiotics stands a good chance of replacing antibiotics in animal husbandry and limiting the adverse effects of antibiotic abuse.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100419
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalOne Health
Volume15
Early online date23 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The contribution of LB is financed by the project Preparedness for Emerging Infectious Diseases with project number VI.Veni.201S.044 of the research programme Veni SGW which is financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). The funding source had no involvement in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the data, writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

Funding

The contribution of LB is financed by the project Preparedness for Emerging Infectious Diseases with project number VI.Veni.201S.044 of the research programme Veni SGW which is financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). The funding source had no involvement in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of the data, writing of the report or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Keywords

  • Antibiotic use
  • Enzymes
  • One health
  • Prebiotics
  • Probiotics
  • Veterinary intestinal health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Innovations in the veterinary intestinal health field: A patent landscape analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this