Integrated value function construction with application to impact assessments

T.J. Stewart, R. Janssen

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this article, an integrated structure is provided for processing various forms of imprecise preference information in the context of multicriteria impact assessments. Linear programing formulations generate best-fit value function models and associated ranking of alternatives, both when preferences are overdetermined (leading to potential inconsistencies) or when preference information is incomplete. In the latter context, the algorithm identifies a range of possible rank orders for the decision alternatives under consideration, consistent with the information provided. The approach is primarily aimed at structuring opinions of experts concerning the desirability of different actions in terms of technical aspects, intended as input into the final political decision-making process. It is demonstrated that the approach described here can be implemented with modest levels of effort by the experts. Experience is reported with the approach in the context of soil sanitation problem in the Netherlands, in which experts expressed satisfaction with the resulting rank ordering of alternatives. © 2013 International Federation of Operational Research Societies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)559-578
    Number of pages20
    JournalInternational Transactions in Operational Research
    Volume20
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Sanitation
    Decision making
    Soils
    Processing
    Integrated
    Impact assessment
    Value function

    Cite this

    @article{40afc95c75254e54bc4104f907407b5a,
    title = "Integrated value function construction with application to impact assessments",
    abstract = "In this article, an integrated structure is provided for processing various forms of imprecise preference information in the context of multicriteria impact assessments. Linear programing formulations generate best-fit value function models and associated ranking of alternatives, both when preferences are overdetermined (leading to potential inconsistencies) or when preference information is incomplete. In the latter context, the algorithm identifies a range of possible rank orders for the decision alternatives under consideration, consistent with the information provided. The approach is primarily aimed at structuring opinions of experts concerning the desirability of different actions in terms of technical aspects, intended as input into the final political decision-making process. It is demonstrated that the approach described here can be implemented with modest levels of effort by the experts. Experience is reported with the approach in the context of soil sanitation problem in the Netherlands, in which experts expressed satisfaction with the resulting rank ordering of alternatives. {\circledC} 2013 International Federation of Operational Research Societies.",
    author = "T.J. Stewart and R. Janssen",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1111/itor.12016",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "559--578",
    journal = "International Transactions in Operational Research",
    issn = "0969-6016",
    publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",

    }

    Integrated value function construction with application to impact assessments. / Stewart, T.J.; Janssen, R.

    In: International Transactions in Operational Research, Vol. 20, 2013, p. 559-578.

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Integrated value function construction with application to impact assessments

    AU - Stewart, T.J.

    AU - Janssen, R.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - In this article, an integrated structure is provided for processing various forms of imprecise preference information in the context of multicriteria impact assessments. Linear programing formulations generate best-fit value function models and associated ranking of alternatives, both when preferences are overdetermined (leading to potential inconsistencies) or when preference information is incomplete. In the latter context, the algorithm identifies a range of possible rank orders for the decision alternatives under consideration, consistent with the information provided. The approach is primarily aimed at structuring opinions of experts concerning the desirability of different actions in terms of technical aspects, intended as input into the final political decision-making process. It is demonstrated that the approach described here can be implemented with modest levels of effort by the experts. Experience is reported with the approach in the context of soil sanitation problem in the Netherlands, in which experts expressed satisfaction with the resulting rank ordering of alternatives. © 2013 International Federation of Operational Research Societies.

    AB - In this article, an integrated structure is provided for processing various forms of imprecise preference information in the context of multicriteria impact assessments. Linear programing formulations generate best-fit value function models and associated ranking of alternatives, both when preferences are overdetermined (leading to potential inconsistencies) or when preference information is incomplete. In the latter context, the algorithm identifies a range of possible rank orders for the decision alternatives under consideration, consistent with the information provided. The approach is primarily aimed at structuring opinions of experts concerning the desirability of different actions in terms of technical aspects, intended as input into the final political decision-making process. It is demonstrated that the approach described here can be implemented with modest levels of effort by the experts. Experience is reported with the approach in the context of soil sanitation problem in the Netherlands, in which experts expressed satisfaction with the resulting rank ordering of alternatives. © 2013 International Federation of Operational Research Societies.

    U2 - 10.1111/itor.12016

    DO - 10.1111/itor.12016

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 559

    EP - 578

    JO - International Transactions in Operational Research

    JF - International Transactions in Operational Research

    SN - 0969-6016

    ER -