Intelligence Assessment Instruments in Adult Prison Populations: A Systematic Review

A. Y.M. van Esch, A. D. Denzel, E. J.A. Scherder, E. D.M. Masthoff

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Detection of intellectual disability (ID) in the penitentiary system is important for the following reasons: (a) to provide assistance to people with ID in understanding their legal rights and court proceedings; (b) to facilitate rehabilitation programs tailored to ID patients, which improves the enhancement of their quality of life and reduces their risk of reoffending; and (c) to provide a reliable estimate of the risk of offence recidivism. It requires a short assessment instrument that provides a reliable estimation of a person’s intellectual functioning at the earliest possible stage of this process. The aim of this systematic review is (a) to provide an overview of recent short assessment instruments that provide a full-scale IQ score in adult prison populations and (b) to achieve a quality measurement of the validation studies regarding these instruments to determine which tests are most feasible in this target population. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement is used to ensure reliability. The Satz-Mögel, an item-reduction short form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, shows the highest correlation with the golden standard and is described to be most reliable. Nevertheless, when it comes to applicability in prison populations, the shorter and less verbal Quick Test can be preferred over others. Without affecting these conclusions, major limitations emerge from the present systematic review, which give rise to several important recommendations for further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3225-3244
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Volume62
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Prisons
Intelligence
Intellectual Disability
Population
Civil Rights
Validation Studies
Health Services Needs and Demand
Prothrombin Time
Disabled Persons
Meta-Analysis
Rehabilitation
Quality of Life
Research
Systematic Review
Prison

Bibliographical note

first published online: December 1, 2017

Keywords

  • assessment
  • forensic mental health
  • intellectual disability
  • prison

Cite this

@article{51dc9ae455fe4d3abefa37fd58811964,
title = "Intelligence Assessment Instruments in Adult Prison Populations: A Systematic Review",
abstract = "Detection of intellectual disability (ID) in the penitentiary system is important for the following reasons: (a) to provide assistance to people with ID in understanding their legal rights and court proceedings; (b) to facilitate rehabilitation programs tailored to ID patients, which improves the enhancement of their quality of life and reduces their risk of reoffending; and (c) to provide a reliable estimate of the risk of offence recidivism. It requires a short assessment instrument that provides a reliable estimation of a person’s intellectual functioning at the earliest possible stage of this process. The aim of this systematic review is (a) to provide an overview of recent short assessment instruments that provide a full-scale IQ score in adult prison populations and (b) to achieve a quality measurement of the validation studies regarding these instruments to determine which tests are most feasible in this target population. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement is used to ensure reliability. The Satz-M{\"o}gel, an item-reduction short form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, shows the highest correlation with the golden standard and is described to be most reliable. Nevertheless, when it comes to applicability in prison populations, the shorter and less verbal Quick Test can be preferred over others. Without affecting these conclusions, major limitations emerge from the present systematic review, which give rise to several important recommendations for further research.",
keywords = "assessment, forensic mental health, intellectual disability, prison",
author = "{van Esch}, {A. Y.M.} and Denzel, {A. D.} and Scherder, {E. J.A.} and Masthoff, {E. D.M.}",
note = "first published online: December 1, 2017",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0306624X17739186",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "3225--3244",
journal = "International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology",
issn = "0306-624X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "10",

}

Intelligence Assessment Instruments in Adult Prison Populations : A Systematic Review. / van Esch, A. Y.M.; Denzel, A. D.; Scherder, E. J.A.; Masthoff, E. D.M.

In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 62, No. 10, 01.08.2018, p. 3225-3244.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intelligence Assessment Instruments in Adult Prison Populations

T2 - A Systematic Review

AU - van Esch, A. Y.M.

AU - Denzel, A. D.

AU - Scherder, E. J.A.

AU - Masthoff, E. D.M.

N1 - first published online: December 1, 2017

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Detection of intellectual disability (ID) in the penitentiary system is important for the following reasons: (a) to provide assistance to people with ID in understanding their legal rights and court proceedings; (b) to facilitate rehabilitation programs tailored to ID patients, which improves the enhancement of their quality of life and reduces their risk of reoffending; and (c) to provide a reliable estimate of the risk of offence recidivism. It requires a short assessment instrument that provides a reliable estimation of a person’s intellectual functioning at the earliest possible stage of this process. The aim of this systematic review is (a) to provide an overview of recent short assessment instruments that provide a full-scale IQ score in adult prison populations and (b) to achieve a quality measurement of the validation studies regarding these instruments to determine which tests are most feasible in this target population. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement is used to ensure reliability. The Satz-Mögel, an item-reduction short form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, shows the highest correlation with the golden standard and is described to be most reliable. Nevertheless, when it comes to applicability in prison populations, the shorter and less verbal Quick Test can be preferred over others. Without affecting these conclusions, major limitations emerge from the present systematic review, which give rise to several important recommendations for further research.

AB - Detection of intellectual disability (ID) in the penitentiary system is important for the following reasons: (a) to provide assistance to people with ID in understanding their legal rights and court proceedings; (b) to facilitate rehabilitation programs tailored to ID patients, which improves the enhancement of their quality of life and reduces their risk of reoffending; and (c) to provide a reliable estimate of the risk of offence recidivism. It requires a short assessment instrument that provides a reliable estimation of a person’s intellectual functioning at the earliest possible stage of this process. The aim of this systematic review is (a) to provide an overview of recent short assessment instruments that provide a full-scale IQ score in adult prison populations and (b) to achieve a quality measurement of the validation studies regarding these instruments to determine which tests are most feasible in this target population. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement is used to ensure reliability. The Satz-Mögel, an item-reduction short form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, shows the highest correlation with the golden standard and is described to be most reliable. Nevertheless, when it comes to applicability in prison populations, the shorter and less verbal Quick Test can be preferred over others. Without affecting these conclusions, major limitations emerge from the present systematic review, which give rise to several important recommendations for further research.

KW - assessment

KW - forensic mental health

KW - intellectual disability

KW - prison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041499334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041499334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306624X17739186

DO - 10.1177/0306624X17739186

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 3225

EP - 3244

JO - International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

JF - International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

SN - 0306-624X

IS - 10

ER -