Abstract
Objectives Increasing the price of tobacco is one of the most effective measures to reduce the prevalence of smoking. In the Netherlands, the excise tax on tobacco increased by €1.14 in 2020, raising the price of a standard package of cigarettes to €8.00. This study investigates how young adults intend to change their smoking behaviour in the case of hypothetical price increases of a pack of cigarettes, and which background characteristics are associated with intended behaviour change. Design A cross-sectional online survey was carried out between September and November 2020. Smokers indicated how they would react to several hypothetical increases in price. Four behavioural options were investigated: smoking less, quitting smoking, switching to another/cheaper product and buying cheaper cigarettes cross-border. Participants Data were obtained from 776 Dutch smokers between 15 and 25 years. Results At a hypothetical price of €10 per package, most respondents reported an intention to smoke less (67%), followed by switching to another/cheaper product (61%), quitting smoking (49%) and shopping for cigarettes cross-border (47%). Prior quit attempts, agreeing with the increase in excise tax and the intention to quit smoking in the future increased the odds of changing behaviour. Higher self-efficacy decreased the odds of behavioural change. Conclusion Many young adults intend to change their smoking behaviour in the event of increased prices. Although intended behaviour can deviate significantly from actual behaviour, an increase in excise tax may result in a significant amount of quit attempts and reduced smoking among young adults.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e065535 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 12 |
Early online date | 28 Dec 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij to the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij is an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, the Dutch Lung Fund and KWF Cancer Foundation.
Funding Information:
We thank Marieke Hiemstra and Corentine Fargeix for reviewing earlier versions of this paper. This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij to the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij is an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, the Dutch Lung Fund and KWF Cancer Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
Funding
This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij to the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij is an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, the Dutch Lung Fund and KWF Cancer Foundation. We thank Marieke Hiemstra and Corentine Fargeix for reviewing earlier versions of this paper. This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij to the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment. Gezondheidsfondsen voor Rookvrij is an initiative of the Dutch Heart Foundation, the Dutch Lung Fund and KWF Cancer Foundation.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Dutch Lung Fund | |
KWF Cancer Foundation | |
National Institute of Public Health and the Environment | |
Hartstichting |
Keywords
- Humans
- Young Adult
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Smoking Cessation
- Tobacco Products
- Smoking/epidemiology
- Nicotiana
- Taxes
- Commerce