Intensifying to cease: Unpacking the process of information systems discontinuance

Mohammad Hosein Rezazade Mehrizi, Joan Rodon Modol, Milad Zafar Nezhad

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Legacy information systems consume a large portion of information technology budgets and often impose serious limitations on organizations' flexibility and innovation. Despite the extensive literature on how organizations adopt and use new IS, we know little about how organizations discontinue their legacy IS. Current studies suggest some actions and events to cease mechanisms such as legitimization, learning, and routinization that give continuity to the systems. However, we do not know when these actions emerge in the discontinuance process to gradually reduce the organizational commitments to legacy IS, nor do we know how ceasing one mechanism can facilitate or, conversely, hamper ceasing other mechanisms, especially when these systems involve interdependences between various components. Based on a process analysis of four software companies, we show that, contrary to the current literature, IS discontinuance is not a matter of merely ceasing each and every mechanism of an established IS; rather, it often requires that some mechanisms be temporarily intensified to prevent premature discontinuance and enable subsequent cessation of other mechanisms. Through cross-case analysis, we articulate a set of causal mechanisms that expands our understanding of how the discontinuance process can be differently shaped by organizational commitments and interdependences involved in legacy IS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-165
Number of pages25
JournalMIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Information systems
Information technology
Innovation
Industry
Organizational commitment
Interdependence

Keywords

  • Information systems discontinuance
  • Obsolescence
  • Organizational path
  • Process model
  • Self-reinforcing mechanisms

Cite this

@article{71608ae2a6c34c048c4dfb5bf95c663f,
title = "Intensifying to cease: Unpacking the process of information systems discontinuance",
abstract = "Legacy information systems consume a large portion of information technology budgets and often impose serious limitations on organizations' flexibility and innovation. Despite the extensive literature on how organizations adopt and use new IS, we know little about how organizations discontinue their legacy IS. Current studies suggest some actions and events to cease mechanisms such as legitimization, learning, and routinization that give continuity to the systems. However, we do not know when these actions emerge in the discontinuance process to gradually reduce the organizational commitments to legacy IS, nor do we know how ceasing one mechanism can facilitate or, conversely, hamper ceasing other mechanisms, especially when these systems involve interdependences between various components. Based on a process analysis of four software companies, we show that, contrary to the current literature, IS discontinuance is not a matter of merely ceasing each and every mechanism of an established IS; rather, it often requires that some mechanisms be temporarily intensified to prevent premature discontinuance and enable subsequent cessation of other mechanisms. Through cross-case analysis, we articulate a set of causal mechanisms that expands our understanding of how the discontinuance process can be differently shaped by organizational commitments and interdependences involved in legacy IS.",
keywords = "Information systems discontinuance, Obsolescence, Organizational path, Process model, Self-reinforcing mechanisms",
author = "Mehrizi, {Mohammad Hosein Rezazade} and Modol, {Joan Rodon} and Nezhad, {Milad Zafar}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.25300/MISQ/2019/13717",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "141--165",
journal = "MIS Quarterly",
issn = "0276-7783",
publisher = "Management Information Systems Research Center",
number = "1",

}

Intensifying to cease : Unpacking the process of information systems discontinuance. / Mehrizi, Mohammad Hosein Rezazade; Modol, Joan Rodon; Nezhad, Milad Zafar.

In: MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, Vol. 43, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 141-165.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intensifying to cease

T2 - Unpacking the process of information systems discontinuance

AU - Mehrizi, Mohammad Hosein Rezazade

AU - Modol, Joan Rodon

AU - Nezhad, Milad Zafar

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Legacy information systems consume a large portion of information technology budgets and often impose serious limitations on organizations' flexibility and innovation. Despite the extensive literature on how organizations adopt and use new IS, we know little about how organizations discontinue their legacy IS. Current studies suggest some actions and events to cease mechanisms such as legitimization, learning, and routinization that give continuity to the systems. However, we do not know when these actions emerge in the discontinuance process to gradually reduce the organizational commitments to legacy IS, nor do we know how ceasing one mechanism can facilitate or, conversely, hamper ceasing other mechanisms, especially when these systems involve interdependences between various components. Based on a process analysis of four software companies, we show that, contrary to the current literature, IS discontinuance is not a matter of merely ceasing each and every mechanism of an established IS; rather, it often requires that some mechanisms be temporarily intensified to prevent premature discontinuance and enable subsequent cessation of other mechanisms. Through cross-case analysis, we articulate a set of causal mechanisms that expands our understanding of how the discontinuance process can be differently shaped by organizational commitments and interdependences involved in legacy IS.

AB - Legacy information systems consume a large portion of information technology budgets and often impose serious limitations on organizations' flexibility and innovation. Despite the extensive literature on how organizations adopt and use new IS, we know little about how organizations discontinue their legacy IS. Current studies suggest some actions and events to cease mechanisms such as legitimization, learning, and routinization that give continuity to the systems. However, we do not know when these actions emerge in the discontinuance process to gradually reduce the organizational commitments to legacy IS, nor do we know how ceasing one mechanism can facilitate or, conversely, hamper ceasing other mechanisms, especially when these systems involve interdependences between various components. Based on a process analysis of four software companies, we show that, contrary to the current literature, IS discontinuance is not a matter of merely ceasing each and every mechanism of an established IS; rather, it often requires that some mechanisms be temporarily intensified to prevent premature discontinuance and enable subsequent cessation of other mechanisms. Through cross-case analysis, we articulate a set of causal mechanisms that expands our understanding of how the discontinuance process can be differently shaped by organizational commitments and interdependences involved in legacy IS.

KW - Information systems discontinuance

KW - Obsolescence

KW - Organizational path

KW - Process model

KW - Self-reinforcing mechanisms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067350085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067350085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.25300/MISQ/2019/13717

DO - 10.25300/MISQ/2019/13717

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 141

EP - 165

JO - MIS Quarterly

JF - MIS Quarterly

SN - 0276-7783

IS - 1

ER -