Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: Results of a photo experiment *

Marjan P. Hagenzieker, Sander van der Kint, Luuk Vissers, Ingrid N.L.G. van Schagen, Jonathan de Bruin, Paul van Gent, Jacques J.F. Commandeur

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Cyclists may have incorrect expectations of the behaviour of automated vehicles in interactions with them, which could bring extra risks in traffic. This study investigated whether expectations and behavioural intentions of cyclists when interacting with automated cars differed from those with manually driven cars. A photo experiment was conducted with 35 participants who judged bicycle–car interactions from the perspective of the cyclist. Thirty photos were presented. An experimental design was used with between-subjects factor instruction (two levels: positive, neutral), and two within-subjects factors: car type (three levels: roof name plate, sticker–these two external features indicated automated cars; and traditional car), and series (two levels: first, second). Participants were asked how sure they were to be noticed by the car shown in the photos, whether the car would stop, and how they would behave themselves. A subset of nine participants was equipped with an eye-tracker. Findings generally point to cautious dispositions towards automated cars: participants were not more confident to be noticed when interacting with both types of automated cars than with manually driven cars. Participants were more confident that automated cars would stop for them during the second series and looked significantly longer at automated cars during the first.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Transportation Safety and Security
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019

Fingerprint

Railroad cars
experiment
interaction
Experiments
disposition
traffic
instruction
Design of experiments
Roofs

Keywords

  • automated driving
  • autonomous vehicles
  • cyclists
  • expectations
  • external features
  • interaction
  • road safety
  • road user behaviour

Cite this

Hagenzieker, Marjan P. ; van der Kint, Sander ; Vissers, Luuk ; van Schagen, Ingrid N.L.G. ; de Bruin, Jonathan ; van Gent, Paul ; Commandeur, Jacques J.F. / Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles : Results of a photo experiment *. In: Journal of Transportation Safety and Security. 2019.
@article{75e3694ae5464467a54a8f1968ce2003,
title = "Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles: Results of a photo experiment *",
abstract = "Cyclists may have incorrect expectations of the behaviour of automated vehicles in interactions with them, which could bring extra risks in traffic. This study investigated whether expectations and behavioural intentions of cyclists when interacting with automated cars differed from those with manually driven cars. A photo experiment was conducted with 35 participants who judged bicycle–car interactions from the perspective of the cyclist. Thirty photos were presented. An experimental design was used with between-subjects factor instruction (two levels: positive, neutral), and two within-subjects factors: car type (three levels: roof name plate, sticker–these two external features indicated automated cars; and traditional car), and series (two levels: first, second). Participants were asked how sure they were to be noticed by the car shown in the photos, whether the car would stop, and how they would behave themselves. A subset of nine participants was equipped with an eye-tracker. Findings generally point to cautious dispositions towards automated cars: participants were not more confident to be noticed when interacting with both types of automated cars than with manually driven cars. Participants were more confident that automated cars would stop for them during the second series and looked significantly longer at automated cars during the first.",
keywords = "automated driving, autonomous vehicles, cyclists, expectations, external features, interaction, road safety, road user behaviour",
author = "Hagenzieker, {Marjan P.} and {van der Kint}, Sander and Luuk Vissers and {van Schagen}, {Ingrid N.L.G.} and {de Bruin}, Jonathan and {van Gent}, Paul and Commandeur, {Jacques J.F.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/19439962.2019.1591556",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Transportation Safety and Security",
issn = "1943-9962",
publisher = "Taylor& Francis",

}

Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles : Results of a photo experiment *. / Hagenzieker, Marjan P.; van der Kint, Sander; Vissers, Luuk; van Schagen, Ingrid N.L.G.; de Bruin, Jonathan; van Gent, Paul; Commandeur, Jacques J.F.

In: Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interactions between cyclists and automated vehicles

T2 - Results of a photo experiment *

AU - Hagenzieker, Marjan P.

AU - van der Kint, Sander

AU - Vissers, Luuk

AU - van Schagen, Ingrid N.L.G.

AU - de Bruin, Jonathan

AU - van Gent, Paul

AU - Commandeur, Jacques J.F.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Cyclists may have incorrect expectations of the behaviour of automated vehicles in interactions with them, which could bring extra risks in traffic. This study investigated whether expectations and behavioural intentions of cyclists when interacting with automated cars differed from those with manually driven cars. A photo experiment was conducted with 35 participants who judged bicycle–car interactions from the perspective of the cyclist. Thirty photos were presented. An experimental design was used with between-subjects factor instruction (two levels: positive, neutral), and two within-subjects factors: car type (three levels: roof name plate, sticker–these two external features indicated automated cars; and traditional car), and series (two levels: first, second). Participants were asked how sure they were to be noticed by the car shown in the photos, whether the car would stop, and how they would behave themselves. A subset of nine participants was equipped with an eye-tracker. Findings generally point to cautious dispositions towards automated cars: participants were not more confident to be noticed when interacting with both types of automated cars than with manually driven cars. Participants were more confident that automated cars would stop for them during the second series and looked significantly longer at automated cars during the first.

AB - Cyclists may have incorrect expectations of the behaviour of automated vehicles in interactions with them, which could bring extra risks in traffic. This study investigated whether expectations and behavioural intentions of cyclists when interacting with automated cars differed from those with manually driven cars. A photo experiment was conducted with 35 participants who judged bicycle–car interactions from the perspective of the cyclist. Thirty photos were presented. An experimental design was used with between-subjects factor instruction (two levels: positive, neutral), and two within-subjects factors: car type (three levels: roof name plate, sticker–these two external features indicated automated cars; and traditional car), and series (two levels: first, second). Participants were asked how sure they were to be noticed by the car shown in the photos, whether the car would stop, and how they would behave themselves. A subset of nine participants was equipped with an eye-tracker. Findings generally point to cautious dispositions towards automated cars: participants were not more confident to be noticed when interacting with both types of automated cars than with manually driven cars. Participants were more confident that automated cars would stop for them during the second series and looked significantly longer at automated cars during the first.

KW - automated driving

KW - autonomous vehicles

KW - cyclists

KW - expectations

KW - external features

KW - interaction

KW - road safety

KW - road user behaviour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064715422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064715422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19439962.2019.1591556

DO - 10.1080/19439962.2019.1591556

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security

JF - Journal of Transportation Safety and Security

SN - 1943-9962

ER -