Interest Groups and Strategic Constructivism: Business Actors and Border Security Policies in the European Union

T.E. Baird

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Evidence suggests that business lobbying shapes European Union (EU) border security policies, but there has been no detailed empirical and theoretical work detailing how interest groups exert influence in this domain. Building on strategic constructivist accounts of policy-making, the article argues that EU border security policies have been tailored to the preferences, identities, and frames of business actors through three key processes. Policy preferences are co-constituted by business actors through strategic communication, identities are constructed to gain political legitimacy through strategic legitimation, and social contexts are framed to fit business interests through practices of strategic contextualisation. I use evidence from in-depth interviews with key actors in the field of EU border security policy-making, participant observation at key border security events, and analysis of key policy documents to build the argument.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-136
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

security policy
constructivism
interest group
legitimation
participant observation
evidence
legitimacy
event
communication
interview
European Union
Interest Groups
Constructivism
Security Policy
Policy Making

Keywords

  • Interest groups
  • Border security
  • Constructivism
  • Policy-Making
  • Home Affairs

Cite this

@article{e0019ce982d441519c838a5d430b913f,
title = "Interest Groups and Strategic Constructivism: Business Actors and Border Security Policies in the European Union",
abstract = "Evidence suggests that business lobbying shapes European Union (EU) border security policies, but there has been no detailed empirical and theoretical work detailing how interest groups exert influence in this domain. Building on strategic constructivist accounts of policy-making, the article argues that EU border security policies have been tailored to the preferences, identities, and frames of business actors through three key processes. Policy preferences are co-constituted by business actors through strategic communication, identities are constructed to gain political legitimacy through strategic legitimation, and social contexts are framed to fit business interests through practices of strategic contextualisation. I use evidence from in-depth interviews with key actors in the field of EU border security policy-making, participant observation at key border security events, and analysis of key policy documents to build the argument.",
keywords = "Interest groups, Border security, Constructivism, Policy-Making, Home Affairs",
author = "T.E. Baird",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1369183X.2017.1316185",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "118--136",
journal = "Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies",
issn = "1369-183X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Interest Groups and Strategic Constructivism: Business Actors and Border Security Policies in the European Union. / Baird, T.E.

In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 118-136.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interest Groups and Strategic Constructivism: Business Actors and Border Security Policies in the European Union

AU - Baird, T.E.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Evidence suggests that business lobbying shapes European Union (EU) border security policies, but there has been no detailed empirical and theoretical work detailing how interest groups exert influence in this domain. Building on strategic constructivist accounts of policy-making, the article argues that EU border security policies have been tailored to the preferences, identities, and frames of business actors through three key processes. Policy preferences are co-constituted by business actors through strategic communication, identities are constructed to gain political legitimacy through strategic legitimation, and social contexts are framed to fit business interests through practices of strategic contextualisation. I use evidence from in-depth interviews with key actors in the field of EU border security policy-making, participant observation at key border security events, and analysis of key policy documents to build the argument.

AB - Evidence suggests that business lobbying shapes European Union (EU) border security policies, but there has been no detailed empirical and theoretical work detailing how interest groups exert influence in this domain. Building on strategic constructivist accounts of policy-making, the article argues that EU border security policies have been tailored to the preferences, identities, and frames of business actors through three key processes. Policy preferences are co-constituted by business actors through strategic communication, identities are constructed to gain political legitimacy through strategic legitimation, and social contexts are framed to fit business interests through practices of strategic contextualisation. I use evidence from in-depth interviews with key actors in the field of EU border security policy-making, participant observation at key border security events, and analysis of key policy documents to build the argument.

KW - Interest groups

KW - Border security

KW - Constructivism

KW - Policy-Making

KW - Home Affairs

U2 - 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1316185

DO - 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1316185

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 118

EP - 136

JO - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

JF - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

SN - 1369-183X

IS - 1

ER -