International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC?

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To close the gap between existing country pledges and the necessary ambition level to limit anthropogenic climate change to not more than 2°C average global temperature increase above pre-industrial levels, decision makers from both the public and private domain have started to explore a number of complementary approaches to the top-down targets-and-timetables approach of international climate change policy. Referred to as International Cooperative Initiatives (ICI), these governance arrangements are now also officially acknowledged under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. While proponents see ICIs as important bridging devices towards more ambitious climate policy, in particular up to 2020, critical observers note that the voluntary nature of ICIs makes it difficult to assess their contribution to climate change mitigation. This article scrutinizes the potential of ICIs to meaningfully contribute to closing the emissions gap along the criteria of effectiveness, legitimacy and institutional fit. As means of illustration, the analytical framework is applied to a random sample of nine ICIs (out of a total of 45 listed on the UNFCCC Secretariat's website). We find that while potential technical effectiveness is high, legitimacy and institutional fit should be improved with a view towards integrating ICIs into the emerging post-2015 climate governance architecture.
LanguageEnglish
Pages45-56
JournalGlobal Policy
Volume6
Issue number1
Early online date7 Nov 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
global climate
UNO
climate change
climate
governance
analytical framework
environmental policy
legitimacy
climate policy
temperature
random sample
website
decision maker
Climate
Legitimacy
Governance
climate change mitigation
decision
private domain

Cite this

@article{c4cd9a7c2cfd46a7bd74152511a5baf3,
title = "International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC?",
abstract = "To close the gap between existing country pledges and the necessary ambition level to limit anthropogenic climate change to not more than 2°C average global temperature increase above pre-industrial levels, decision makers from both the public and private domain have started to explore a number of complementary approaches to the top-down targets-and-timetables approach of international climate change policy. Referred to as International Cooperative Initiatives (ICI), these governance arrangements are now also officially acknowledged under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. While proponents see ICIs as important bridging devices towards more ambitious climate policy, in particular up to 2020, critical observers note that the voluntary nature of ICIs makes it difficult to assess their contribution to climate change mitigation. This article scrutinizes the potential of ICIs to meaningfully contribute to closing the emissions gap along the criteria of effectiveness, legitimacy and institutional fit. As means of illustration, the analytical framework is applied to a random sample of nine ICIs (out of a total of 45 listed on the UNFCCC Secretariat's website). We find that while potential technical effectiveness is high, legitimacy and institutional fit should be improved with a view towards integrating ICIs into the emerging post-2015 climate governance architecture.",
author = "O.E. Widerberg and P.H. Pattberg",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/1758-5899.12184",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "45--56",
journal = "Global Policy",
issn = "1758-5880",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC? / Widerberg, O.E.; Pattberg, P.H.

In: Global Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2015, p. 45-56.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance: Raising the ambition level or delegitimizing the UNFCCC?

AU - Widerberg, O.E.

AU - Pattberg, P.H.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - To close the gap between existing country pledges and the necessary ambition level to limit anthropogenic climate change to not more than 2°C average global temperature increase above pre-industrial levels, decision makers from both the public and private domain have started to explore a number of complementary approaches to the top-down targets-and-timetables approach of international climate change policy. Referred to as International Cooperative Initiatives (ICI), these governance arrangements are now also officially acknowledged under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. While proponents see ICIs as important bridging devices towards more ambitious climate policy, in particular up to 2020, critical observers note that the voluntary nature of ICIs makes it difficult to assess their contribution to climate change mitigation. This article scrutinizes the potential of ICIs to meaningfully contribute to closing the emissions gap along the criteria of effectiveness, legitimacy and institutional fit. As means of illustration, the analytical framework is applied to a random sample of nine ICIs (out of a total of 45 listed on the UNFCCC Secretariat's website). We find that while potential technical effectiveness is high, legitimacy and institutional fit should be improved with a view towards integrating ICIs into the emerging post-2015 climate governance architecture.

AB - To close the gap between existing country pledges and the necessary ambition level to limit anthropogenic climate change to not more than 2°C average global temperature increase above pre-industrial levels, decision makers from both the public and private domain have started to explore a number of complementary approaches to the top-down targets-and-timetables approach of international climate change policy. Referred to as International Cooperative Initiatives (ICI), these governance arrangements are now also officially acknowledged under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. While proponents see ICIs as important bridging devices towards more ambitious climate policy, in particular up to 2020, critical observers note that the voluntary nature of ICIs makes it difficult to assess their contribution to climate change mitigation. This article scrutinizes the potential of ICIs to meaningfully contribute to closing the emissions gap along the criteria of effectiveness, legitimacy and institutional fit. As means of illustration, the analytical framework is applied to a random sample of nine ICIs (out of a total of 45 listed on the UNFCCC Secretariat's website). We find that while potential technical effectiveness is high, legitimacy and institutional fit should be improved with a view towards integrating ICIs into the emerging post-2015 climate governance architecture.

U2 - 10.1111/1758-5899.12184

DO - 10.1111/1758-5899.12184

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 45

EP - 56

JO - Global Policy

T2 - Global Policy

JF - Global Policy

SN - 1758-5880

IS - 1

ER -