TY - JOUR
T1 - International expert consensus statement
T2 - surgical failure in obstructive sleep apnea
AU - Iannella, Giannicola
AU - Pace, Annalisa
AU - Magliulo, Giuseppe
AU - Vicini, Claudio
AU - Lugo, Rodolfo
AU - Vanderveken, Olivier M.
AU - de Vries, Nico
AU - Pang, Kenny
AU - Thuler, Eric
AU - Jacobowitz, Ofer
AU - Cahali, Michel Burihan
AU - Maurer, Joachim T.
AU - Casale, Manuele
AU - Moffa, Antonio
AU - Salamanca, Fabrizio
AU - Leone, Federico
AU - Olszewska, Ewa
AU - Reina, Carlos O’connor
AU - Zancanella, Edilson
AU - Hoff, Paul T.
AU - Baptista, Peter
AU - Bahgat, Ahmed Yassin
AU - Ravesloot, Madeline J.L.
AU - van Maanen, Peter
AU - Goldberg, Andrew
AU - Carrasco, Marina
AU - Agrawal, Vikas K.
AU - Lechien, Jerome R.
AU - De Vito, Andrea
AU - Cammaroto, Giovanni
AU - De Virgilio, Armando
AU - Greco, Antonio
AU - Mancini, Patrizia
AU - Perrone, Tiziano
AU - Amado, Steve
AU - Alkan, Uri
AU - Cheong, Ryan Chin Taw
AU - D’Ecclesia, Aurelio
AU - Galantai, Dorina
AU - RajuAnand, Anand
AU - Calvo-Henriquez, Christian
AU - Cocuzza, Salvatore
AU - Arigliani, Michele
AU - Saibene, Alberto Maria
AU - Aragona, Rosario Marchese
AU - Maniaci, Antonino
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Purpose: Upper airway (UA) surgery is commonly employed in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The intricate pathophysiology of OSA, variability in sites and patterns of UA collapse, and the interaction between anatomical and non-anatomical factors in individual patients may contribute to possible surgical failures. This clinical consensus statement aims to identify areas of agreement among a development group comprising international experts in OSA surgery, regarding the appropriate definition, predictive factors in patients, and management of surgical failure in OSA treatment. Methods: A clinical consensus statement (CCS) was developed using the Delphi method by a panel of 35 contributors from various countries. A systematic literature review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. A survey consisting of 60 statements was then formulated and presented to the experts. Results: Following two rounds of the Delphi process, consensus or strong consensus was achieved on 36 items, while 24 items remained without consensus. Specifically, 5 out of 10 statements reached consensus regarding on the 'Definition of Surgical Success/Failure after OSA Surgery'. Regarding the 'Predictive Factors of Surgical Failure in OSA Surgery', consensus was reached on 10 out of 13 statements. In the context of the 'Diagnostic Workup in OSA Surgery', consensus was achieved on 9 out of 13 statements. Lastly, in 'Treatment in Surgical Failure Cases', consensus was reached on 12 out of 24 statements. Conclusion: The management of OSA after surgical failure presents a significant clinical challenge for sleep specialists. This CCS provides valuable guidance for defining, preventing, and addressing surgical failures in the treatment of OSA syndrome.
AB - Purpose: Upper airway (UA) surgery is commonly employed in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The intricate pathophysiology of OSA, variability in sites and patterns of UA collapse, and the interaction between anatomical and non-anatomical factors in individual patients may contribute to possible surgical failures. This clinical consensus statement aims to identify areas of agreement among a development group comprising international experts in OSA surgery, regarding the appropriate definition, predictive factors in patients, and management of surgical failure in OSA treatment. Methods: A clinical consensus statement (CCS) was developed using the Delphi method by a panel of 35 contributors from various countries. A systematic literature review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. A survey consisting of 60 statements was then formulated and presented to the experts. Results: Following two rounds of the Delphi process, consensus or strong consensus was achieved on 36 items, while 24 items remained without consensus. Specifically, 5 out of 10 statements reached consensus regarding on the 'Definition of Surgical Success/Failure after OSA Surgery'. Regarding the 'Predictive Factors of Surgical Failure in OSA Surgery', consensus was reached on 10 out of 13 statements. In the context of the 'Diagnostic Workup in OSA Surgery', consensus was achieved on 9 out of 13 statements. Lastly, in 'Treatment in Surgical Failure Cases', consensus was reached on 12 out of 24 statements. Conclusion: The management of OSA after surgical failure presents a significant clinical challenge for sleep specialists. This CCS provides valuable guidance for defining, preventing, and addressing surgical failures in the treatment of OSA syndrome.
KW - Clinical guidelines
KW - Delphi method
KW - Expert consensus
KW - Obstructive sleep apnea
KW - Sleep disorder management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204555071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85204555071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11325-024-03162-6
DO - 10.1007/s11325-024-03162-6
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39307877
AN - SCOPUS:85204555071
SN - 1520-9512
VL - 28
SP - 2601
EP - 2616
JO - Sleep and breathing
JF - Sleep and breathing
IS - 6
ER -