TY - JOUR
T1 - Interpretation and use of sensitivity in econometrics, illustrated with forecast combinations
AU - Magnus, J.R.
AU - Vasnev, A.L.
N1 - PT: J; NR: 24; TC: 0; J9: INT J FORECASTING; PG: 13; GA: CM6YB; UT: WOS:000357836500014
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Sensitivity analysis is important both for its own sake and in combination with diagnostic testing. We consider the question of how to use sensitivity statistics in practice, and in particular, how to judge whether the sensitivity is large or small. For this purpose, we distinguish between absolute and relative sensitivity, and highlight the context-dependent nature of sensitivity analysis. The relative sensitivity is then applied to forecast combinations, and sensitivity-based weights are introduced. All of the concepts are illustrated using the European yield curve. In this context, it is natural to consider the sensitivity to autocorrelation and normality assumptions. Different forecasting models are combined using equal, fit-based and sensitivity-based weights, and compared with the multivariate and random walk benchmarks. We show that the fit-based and sensitivity-based weights are complementary, but that the sensitivity-based weights perform better than other weights for long-term maturities. Crown Copyright © 2013.
AB - Sensitivity analysis is important both for its own sake and in combination with diagnostic testing. We consider the question of how to use sensitivity statistics in practice, and in particular, how to judge whether the sensitivity is large or small. For this purpose, we distinguish between absolute and relative sensitivity, and highlight the context-dependent nature of sensitivity analysis. The relative sensitivity is then applied to forecast combinations, and sensitivity-based weights are introduced. All of the concepts are illustrated using the European yield curve. In this context, it is natural to consider the sensitivity to autocorrelation and normality assumptions. Different forecasting models are combined using equal, fit-based and sensitivity-based weights, and compared with the multivariate and random walk benchmarks. We show that the fit-based and sensitivity-based weights are complementary, but that the sensitivity-based weights perform better than other weights for long-term maturities. Crown Copyright © 2013.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.08.001
M3 - Article
SN - 0169-2070
VL - 31
SP - 769
EP - 781
JO - International Journal of Forecasting
JF - International Journal of Forecasting
IS - 3
ER -